12.03 Jesus Goes Towards Jerusalem

12.03.10 THE MIRACLE OF LAZARUS

Bill Heinrich  -  Dec 24, 2015  -  Comments Off on 12.03.10 THE MIRACLE OF LAZARUS

12.03.10 Jn. 11:1-37 Bethany

 

THE MIRACLE OF LAZARUS

 

1 Now a man was sick, Lazarus, from Bethany, the village of Mary and her sister Martha. 2 Mary was the one who anointed the Lord with fragrant oil and wiped His feet with her hair, and it was her brother Lazarus who was sick. 3 So the sisters sent a message to Him: “Lord, the one You love is sick.”

4 When Jesus heard it, He said, “This sickness will not end in death but is for the glory of God, so that the Son of God may be glorified through it.” 5 Now Jesus loved Martha, her sister, and Lazarus. 6 So when He heard that he was sick, He stayed two more days in the place where He was. 7 Then after that, He said to the disciples, “Let’s go to Judea again.”

8 “Rabbi,” the disciples told Him, “just now the Jews tried to stone You, and You’re going there again?”

9 Aren’t there 12 hours in a day?” Jesus answered. “If anyone walks during the day, he doesn’t stumble, because he sees the light of this world. 10 If anyone walks during the night, he does stumble, because the light is not in him.” 11 He said this, and then He told them, “Our friend Lazarus has fallen asleep, but I’m on My way to wake him up.”

12 Then the disciples said to Him, “Lord, if he has fallen asleep, he will get well.”

13 Jesus, however, was speaking about his death, but they thought He was speaking about natural sleep. 14 So Jesus then told them plainly, “Lazarus has died. 15 I’m glad for you that I wasn’t there so that you may believe. But let’s go to him.”

16 Then Thomas (called “Twin”) said to his fellow disciples, “Let’s go so that we may die with Him.”

17 When Jesus arrived, He found that Lazarus had already been in the tomb four days.  18 Bethany was near Jerusalem (about two miles away). 19 Many of the Jews had come to Martha and Mary to comfort them about their brother. 20 As soon as Martha heard that Jesus was coming, she went to meet Him. But Mary remained seated in the house.

21 Then Martha said to Jesus, “Lord, if You had been here, my brother wouldn’t have died. 22 Yet even now I know that whatever You ask from God, God will give You.”

23 “Your brother will rise again,” Jesus told her.

24 Martha said, “I know that he will rise again in the resurrection at the last day.”

25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in Me, even if he dies, will live. 26 Everyone who lives and believes in Me will never die — ever. Do you believe this?”

27 “Yes, Lord,” she told Him, “I believe You are the Messiah, the Son of God, who comes into the world.”

28 Having said this, she went back and called her sister Mary, saying in private, “The Teacher is here and is calling for you.”

29 As soon as she heard this, she got up quickly and went to Him. 30 Jesus had not yet come into the village but was still in the place where Martha had met Him. 31 The Jews who were with her in the house consoling her saw that Mary got up quickly and went out. So they followed her, supposing that she was going to the tomb to cry there.

32 When Mary came to where Jesus was and saw Him, she fell at His feet and told Him, “Lord, if You had been here, my brother would not have died!”

33 When Jesus saw her crying, and the Jews who had come with her crying, He was angry in His spirit and deeply moved. 34 “Where have you put him?” He asked.

“Lord,” they told Him, “come and see.”

35 Jesus wept.

36 So the Jews said, “See how He loved him!” 37 But some of them said, “Couldn’t He who opened the blind man’s eyes also have kept this man from dying?”

 

Scholars believe the miracles of raising Lazarus back to life was about six weeks prior to Jesus making His triumphal entry into Jerusalem.[1] Jesus was incredibly popular among the people and this miracle only heightened the expectation that He was the long awaited political-messiah.  This miracle also intensified the threat the religious leaders felt, that, if Jesus really would declare Himself to be the messiah, their wealthy aristocratic lifestyles would be ruined.

 

“Bethany” This small village was located east of Jerusalem on the eastern side of the Mount of Olives. It was well known for its dates and figs, in fact, its name means the place for dates.[2] The village was just beyond a Sabbath’s Day walk from the city walls and was adjacent to another village, Bethpage, whose name means the place for the green or winter fig.[3] Church father Origen (A.D. 184/85 – 253/54) said that Bethpage was a village of priests.[4] That would be logical since the village was close to the temple, and being outside the city village residents could have their own gardens.

 

It has been suggested that the reason Jesus may have chosen to stay with friends in Bethany is because, for many months there were constant threats upon His life.[5]  When He was praying in the Garden of Gethsemane, He asked the disciples to keep watch – probably for the same reason – and they failed to perform as requested.  But in this village He was safe with friends and yet close to Jerusalem.

 

“Thomas (called Didymus).”  The Hebrew name Thomas and its Greek counterpart Didymus, both mean twin. Obviously, there is the possibility that the apostle had a twin brother, who either died previously or for an unknown reason remained outside of recorded Scripture.

 

The resurrection was also the sign of Jonah that had been prophesied. Previously when Jesus resurrected someone, the event was somewhat private and those who witnessed it were told not to tell anyone. But of course, such a profound event never remains silent.  The gospel writers also dedicated only a few lines to those miracles.  But the miracle of Lazarus is in sharp contrast, because as multitudes watched, it forced everyone to make a decision on the identity of Jesus.  The significance of this miracle cannot be understated, because it was the final motivation of the Jewish leadership to have Jesus put to death.[6]

 

Jesus was about to be crucified.  His ministry to the public was almost over and He was spending most of His time and effort building up the faith of His disciples.  This miracle had to do more with His authenticating His person to the disciples than to the community of believers who happened to witness this event.  The faith of these men was going to be shattered when Jesus would be crucified. They would have unending questions. Yet when He would rise to life, so likewise their faith would rise to life.  This miracle would eventually help them place Jesus, His teachings and miracles, into perspective.

 

By the time Jesus arrived at the tomb of Lazarus, the body was wrapped in grave clothes and spices had been placed over it to reduce the offensive odor of the decaying body.  The tomb was whitewashed to mark the site (to prevent anyone becoming defiled) and a stone was rolled over the entrance to prevent wild animals from devouring the body.  The foul odor of death from the tomb left no question in the mind of witnesses that their friend was dead and his body was in the process of decaying.

 

Then one of the women said to Jesus, “If you had been here,” Lazarus would still be alive. As with the centurion whose son was ill in Capernaum (Jn. 4:46-54), these women believed Jesus had to be present to manifest a healing on someone who was still alive.  They believed the healing power of Jesus was limited to only the living. With sternness, yet lovingly, the woman chided Him for not coming sooner. Jesus, then demonstrated His divine authority over Jewish superstitions and death.

12.03.10a

 

12.03.10.Q1 Why did Jesus wait for four days to raise Lazarus up from the dead (Jn. 11:1-37)?

In this historical account, the immediate question pertains to the reason of why Jesus delayed his return to the home of His very good friends in light of the emergency they faced.  Had He no compassion upon them?  The issue here is not one of compassion or friendship. Jesus delayed His return to provide Himself the opportunity to show that He was the Creator of life and the Son of God.  There are four reasons:

 

  1. It was the custom of all Middle Eastern cultures, as it is today, to bury a body on the same day as death occurred.[7] The semi-arid climate conditions will cause decomposition to occur immediately.

 

  1. The Pharisees believed the soul hovered over the body for three days after death, because, in the event of a “resurrection,” the person would have a soul when life returned. This tradition may have originated when someone became unconscious due to an injury and awoke two or three days later (a “resurrection”). Nonetheless, in that sense it was believed there was no hope of a resurrection after three days.  Jesus proved, beyond any shadow of doubt, that Lazarus was dead before bringing a dead smelly Lazarus back to life. As a result, even the Pharisees and Sadducees could not challenge this issue.[8]

 

After three days of decomposition, the eyes of the deceased had decayed, the face was hardly recognizable, maggots have infested the corpse and, therefore, it was believed that there was no hope of a resurrection.[9] The Mishnah reflects the common opinion held from the days of Jesus:

 

For it has been taught, “They adduce evidence as to a corpse’s identity only from the features of the face, including the nose, and they give testimony only within three days [of the deceased’s death].”

Mishnah, Yebamoth 16:3

 

Later, from an eighth century post-Talmudic tractate, additional clarification on this subject is insightful, even though it well outside the acceptable time period for this study.  It reads,

 

“We go out to the cemetery and examine the dead [to see if they are still alive and have been buried by mistake] for a period of three days and do not fear being suspected of engaging in the ways of the Amorites [i.e., superstitious practices]. Once a man who had been buried was examined and found to be alive; he lived for twenty-five years more and then died. Another such person lived and had five children before he died.”

S’machot 8:1[10]

 

  1. It was the custom that after the passing of someone, there were thirty days of mourning.

 

  • . The first three days were for weeping.[11] Some scholars believe that during these    days, phylacteries were not worn, fasting was common (not a complete fast,  eating an egg or lentils was permitted the first seven days),[12] and the mourners     did not greet other people. However, it is unknown if this was a first century    practice in the Holy Land or if this was a later cultural practice.[13]  
  •  The following seven days were for lamentation. But this time frame included the    fourth day which was known as the high day of mourning. It was believed that on   day his soul departed and went to sheol (Hades) never to return.[14] In essence,  to rephrase his condition in a modern term, “he was good and dead.”[15 Therefore, a fourth day event was truly a resurrection from death to life – that in  the Jewish mind, only God could perform. It was also a silent attack against    those  who claimed Jesus performed miracles with demonic powers, for it was  believed  that demons could kill, but not restore or create life.
  •  The balance of the thirty days for intermission from washing their clothes and                        shaving.[16]

 

  1. Jesus always brings understanding of Himself to the level of comprehension of those to whom He desires to show His love and compassion. It was believed that only God could raise a person back to life immediately after death, but it was also believed that not even God could raise anyone once the body began to decay. Therefore, Jesus demonstrated that His power of life was far beyond their concept of God. The primary reason Jesus delayed His arrival by four days was because He was about to perform a miracle greater than His messianic miracles – miracles the Jews believed that only the true messiah could perform.[17] This miracle was more than just raising a dead person back to life — an astounding feat by itself—but Jesus also proclaimed His deity without a single spoken word! Because only God can give life!

12.03.10b

 

  1. In the gospels, especially in the book of John, it appears that Jesus moved on His own initiative. He was never pressured to do anything and never in a hurry – but always functioned in His timing. When Mary came to Jesus, He essentially told her that He would come in His time and in His way.

 

“To cry there…crying…crying.”  The Greek word klaio means, to wail loudly, as in loud lamentation or loud weeping.[18]  It was the custom, and still continues to be, that to comfort the grieving family professional mourners were employed to weep loudly – an exercise of comfort that is generally not understood by modern Westerners.

 

“Jesus wept.”  The Greek word dakryo means to weep silently.[19] This short sentence reflects the great compassion Jesus had for his dearest friends.  All too often, those who declare this to be the shortest verse of Scripture fail to see that it is in fact, the deepest verse.  The compassion of Jesus for the human condition is immense. Believers all too often fail to recognize this. This condition is more than an illness that ends physical life, but is the effect of the original sin.  In this case, the death of Lazarus meant his two unmarried sisters would be without financial support and, therefore, would be condemned to a life of poverty. From the moment Jesus heard of the illness of Lazarus, He knew that He was about to raise him from death.  So why did Jesus weep?

 

Jesus wept because He recognized all too well the effects of sin on the lives of those He so dearly loved.  It brought forth physical, as well as spiritual death.  Jesus mourned for their affliction and the effect of sin upon humanity, yet He knew the glorious future that lies ahead of those who follow Him. Some scholars have suggested that the reason Jesus wept was that he looked into the future and saw the incredible destruction that would come upon the people of Jerusalem in the years 70 and 135, along with the eviction from the Holy City.  The Roman historian Cassius Dio Cocceianus in A.D. 222 said that as the result of the Simon bar Kokhba in the year 135, about 580,000 Jewish men were killed in various raids and battles and 985 villages were razed to the ground. The number who died from disease and famine could not be counted.[20] There is little question that when Jesus envisioned this horrific future event, He wept, but His primary sorrow was the effects of sin upon humanity.

 

In raising Lazarus and others from death, Jesus demonstrated that He was God.  Words did not have to be spoken.   Two previous prophets, Elijah and Elisha, as well as two apostles, Paul and Peter, also raised the dead back to life.  However, each declared the miracle to be the work of our Lord and not of their strength or action. But here Jesus performed a miracle in His own authority.

 

A point of interest should be noted in this narrative.  Lazarus had a typical Jewish burial that included wrapping the body in the customary manner. That meant his head, arms, and legs were tightly wrapped with linens.  The mystery remains of how he was able to get up and walk out of the tomb and see where he was going. Nonetheless, while Jesus raised him from the grave, He asked the people around him to remove the burial clothes. This was another demonstration where the God of Life desires His followers to participate in miracles.

 

“Couldn’t He who opened the blind man’s eyes also have kept this man from dying?” This was not just a passing statement, but a reflection on the messianic miracles that Jesus performed. The idea that Jesus could be God incarnate was still to be discovered.

[1]. Bookman, When God Wore Sandals. CD Trac 11, 12.

 

[2]. Geikie, The Life and Words of Christ. 2:401.

 

[3]. Geikie, The Life and Words of Christ. 2:401.

 

[4]. Origen, Commentary on Matthew. 16, 17 on Matthew 21:1.

 

[5]. Farrar, The Life of Christ. 383.

 

[6]. Nelesen, Yeshua; the Promise, the Land, the Messiah. (Video Tape 2).

 

[7]. Babylonian Talmud, Mo’ed Katan 28a (Mid-Festival Days); Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 46b.

[8]. Gilbrant, “John.” 315; Moseley, Yeshua: A Guide to the Real Jesus and the Original Church. 123; Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament. 2:206.

 

[9]. Pickup, “ ‘On the Third Day’: The Time Frame of Jesus’ Death and Resurrection.” 522-23; Lang, Know the Words of Jesus. 330.

 

[10]. Quoted by Stern, Jewish New Testament Commentary. 190-91.

 

[11]. Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica. 3:363-64.

 

[12]. Geikie, The Life and Words of Christ. 2:330.

 

[13]. Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica. 3:366. It is a constant challenge to isolate the first century Jewish cultural norms from later practices.

 

[14]. Fruchtenbaum, The Jewish Foundation of the Life of Messiah: Instructor’s Manual. Class 18, page 15; Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica. 3:367.

 

[15]. The belief that the soul remained in the corpse for three days was known in other cultures as well.  See Pickup. “ ‘On the Third Day’: The Time Frame of Jesus’ Death and resurrection.” 522 n51.

 

[16]. Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica. 3:363-64.

 

[17]. For a description of the three messianic miracles, see 06.03.08.Q1, 06.03.08.Q2, 06.01.03, John 4:25 as well as the related video link 08.03.08.V. See also the comparison of Dead Sea Scroll fragments 4Q278 and 4Q521 with Luke 4:16-30 at 06.02.02; Fischer, The Gospels in Their Jewish Context. (Lecture on CD/MP3). Week 10, Session 2.

 

[18]. See also Mt. 2:18; Mk. 5:38; Lk. 6:21; 7:32; Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament. 2:204;  Fruchtenbaum, The Jewish Foundation of the Life of Messiah: Instructor’s Manual. Class 18, pages 14-15.

 

[19]. Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament. 2:204-05;   Fruchtenbaum, The Jewish Foundation of the Life of Messiah: Instructor’s Manual. Class 18, pages 14-15.

 

[20].  Dio Caccius, Roman History 69.14;  http://orion.it.luc.edu/~avande1/jerusalem/sources/cassiusDio-69.htm.  Retrieved November 25, 2012.

 

 



12.03.11 LAZARUS RAISED TO LIFE

Bill Heinrich  -  Dec 24, 2015  -  Comments Off on 12.03.11 LAZARUS RAISED TO LIFE

12.03.11 Jn. 11:38-44 Bethany

 

LAZARUS RAISED TO LIFE

   

38 Then Jesus, angry in Himself again, came to the tomb. It was a cave, and a stone was lying against it. 39 “Remove the stone,” Jesus said.

Martha, the dead man’s sister, told Him, “Lord, he’s already decaying. It’s been four days.”

40 Jesus said to her, “Didn’t I tell you that if you believed you would see the glory of God?”

41 So they removed the stone. Then Jesus raised His eyes and said, “Father, I thank You that You heard Me. 42 I know that You always hear Me, but because of the crowd standing here I said this, so they may believe You sent Me.” 43 After He said this, He shouted with a loud voice, “Lazarus, come out!” 44 The dead man came out bound hand and foot with linen strips and with his face wrapped in a cloth. Jesus said to them, “Loose him and let him go.”

 

 

12.03.11.B. THE TOMB OF LAZARUS

 

12.03.11.B. THE TOMB OF LAZARUS.  The tomb site has been authenticated; however, the tomb itself has changed over the years. The tomb shelf upon which the body was laid no longer exists and the steps inside the cave were carved in the rock by the Franciscans in 1610.[1]  Today, the tomb is attached to a mosque. Photograph by the author.

 

“Angry in Himself.” This phrase would be better translated as groaned in Himself or deeply moved within.[2]  The phrase is also found previously in verse 33. The question of course is, “what caused Jesus to groan within?”  There are three possible reasons.

 

  1. He could have been angry at the effects of sin and death upon the human race. After all, it was Jesus who formed mankind in His own image in the Garden of Eden. Now He was experiencing the pain and emotional stress of His friends that were the result of sin and death entering the earth.

 

  1. Or He may have been upset at the professional mourners. Or He may have been upset for both of these reasons.

 

  1. He may have been upset that after spending more than three years in ministry, the people still did not understand who He was or the purpose of His coming.

 

By performing this miracle, Jesus again demonstrated that He had power over death and life and, therefore, He was the true Messiah.  One of the great ironies is that because of His raising of Lazarus from the dead, the leading Pharisees and Sadducees determined to kill Him. Those who had desired Jesus to perform one mighty miracle to prove that He was the messiah, refused to believe what was overwhelmingly obvious.  They chose not to believe; they chose not to see the truth.

12.03.11a

 

The leading Pharisees and Sadducees of the Sanhedrin gathered to discuss the incredible miracle.  They faced two serious dilemmas.

 

  1. If Jesus were to be accepted as the messiah, then Rome would most certainly crush not only Jesus, but also Israel and the aristocrats would lose their wealthy, social-economic lifestyle. They could not imagine Jesus being a military victor over the Romans, but they could not deny His impressive miracles.

 

  1. If Jesus took control only of the temple and the religious part of the Jewish life, they too, would lose their social position.

 

Either way, they would lose. So therefore, Jesus would have to be eliminated. A formal presentation to the Sanhedrin to kill Him was about to be made.  Reports of the miracle spread like wildfire. No doubt, there were those who believed that if any man could perform such mighty acts, he could also overthrow the Roman oppressors and replace the corrupt temple establishment.  Little wonder then that some members of the Sanhedrin seriously worried about their future.

[1]. Wilkinson, Jerusalem Pilgrims Before the Crusades. 112.

[2]. Fruchtenbaum, The Jewish Foundation of the Life of Messiah: Instructor’s Manual. Class 18, page 15.

 



12.03.12 SANHEDRIN PLOTS TO KILL JESUS

Bill Heinrich  -  Dec 24, 2015  -  Comments Off on 12.03.12 SANHEDRIN PLOTS TO KILL JESUS

12.03.12 Jn. 11:45-53 Jerusalem

 

SANHEDRIN PLOTS TO KILL JESUS

 

45 Therefore, many of the Jews who came to Mary and saw what He did believed in Him. 46 But some of them went to the Pharisees and told them what Jesus had done.

47 So the chief priests and the Pharisees convened the Sanhedrin and said, “What are we going to do since this man does many signs? 48 If we let Him continue in this way, everyone will believe in Him! Then the Romans will come and remove both our place and our nation.”

49 One of them, Caiaphas, who was high priest that year, said to them, “You know nothing at all! 50 You’re not considering that it is to your advantage that one man should die for the people rather than the whole nation perish.51 He did not say this on his own, but being high priest that year he prophesied that Jesus was going to die for the nation, 52 and not for the nation only, but also to unite the scattered children of God. 53 So from that day on they plotted to kill Him.

 

“What are we going to do since this man does many signs?”  What an incredible confession – a confession that they recognized that Jesus had performed many signs proving beyond any shadow of doubt that He was the expected messiah. He had not only performed the three messianic miracles, but by raising the dead to life, He went beyond those three incredible miracles.[1] But rather than accepting Him for who He was, they were more concerned about losing “both our place and our nation.” Interestingly, in the year A.D. 70, they lost everything they feared they would lose, and they didn’t have Jesus either. It wasn’t just that Jesus performed miracles, but these miracles were “signs.”  The term connected the miraculous events with specific prophecies of messianic identity.  There was absolutely no possibility of ignorance – but a full knowledge rejection of Jesus the Messiah.

 12.03.12a

 

The “signs” of miracles were so many, that the modern reader forgets that there were many other signs as well – prophetic signs that He fulfilled.

Caiaphas, who was high priest that year.”  Caiaphas was the chief instigator, using whatever dictatorial methods possible, to have Jesus executed.  As high priest, he was to represent the people to their God. Instead, he was an impatient, insulting, overbearing and Hellenistic tyrant similar to Herod the Great. Both Caiaphas and Herod the Great were the ultimate in greed personified.  No one dared to speak against either one without first considering the consequences.

Critics have argued that this phrase reflects an error in John’s account, because according to the Law of Moses, the high priest held his position for life.  They are correct concerning the Law of Moses, however, the first century high priest was a position filled by the local Roman governor. Furthermore, neither the Sadducees nor the Romans had any regard for the Laws of Moses.  Yet it is an interesting irony of history that in that year, Caiaphas would be the instrument in the sacrifice of Him who would take away the sin of the world.

 

 

12.03.12.Q1 Did the high priest have a rope tied around his ankle when he entered the Holy of Holies?

A traditional myth says that whenever the high priest went into the Holy of Holies, he had a rope tied around his ankle.  This was because if there was any sin found in him, God would strike him dead.  The end of the rope was available for others to pull his body out without entering the sacred area.  According to scholars at the Temple Institute this writer has interviewed, this teaching is false.[2]  Furthermore, there is no evidence of this practice in any rabbinic writings that carefully describe the activities in the temple. Were that myth to have been true, then one must question why God did not kill several high priests, especially Caiaphas who one of the most evil of all high priests?

                       

You know nothing at all!”  This is hardly the kind of speech one would expect from a priest, and especially a high priest.  However, Caiaphas was hardly a person with any God-like characteristics, but he was typical of all the Sadducees.  Josephus made this comment about them.

 

The behavior of the Sadducees to one another is rather crude, and their intercourse (conversation) with their equals is rough, as it is with strangers.

Josephus, Wars 2.8.14 (166b)[3]

 

Amazingly, Mark refers to the Sadducees once by name and Luke refers to them five times, but only in his book of Acts. John never calls them by name at all.  Yet they were the primary instigators that led to the crucifixion. The leading Pharisees clearly challenged Jesus numerous times and even planned His death, but eventually stepped aside and let the Sadducees do their dirty work.

“You’re not considering that it is to your advantage that one man should die for the people rather than the whole nation perish.”  Is it not amazing that Caiaphas spoke these words, since they became profoundly prophetic?  This was the formal declaration to have Jesus killed. Just as the pagan prophet Balaam gave a true prophecy (Num. 24:17), so did the Hellenistic Caiaphas. National Israel would now be guilty of His death. To Caiaphas the death of Jesus would solve a political-religious problem while to God the death would solve the sin problem of all humanity.  The irony is that while the Romans repeatedly crucified messianic pretenders,[4]  when the real messiah was before them, they repeatedly found Him innocent.  Only the religious leaders wanted Him crucified. The most common people and many in the Sanhedrin knew the life and reputation of Jesus was above reproach. As will be shown, it was the Sadducees and not the leading Pharisees, who eventually condemned Jesus to death and turned Him over to the Romans for execution.

12.03.12b

 

To be a member of the distinguished Sanhedrin, a man had to be a minimum age of thirty, although most members were much older in this life-long career.  Since Jesus was only in His mid-thirties by now, His words were all the more painful.  He cut through their rhetoric and exposed their impure motives in public. It was extremely embarrassing for older men when a young man like Him repeatedly won arguments in a culture where the words of a Sanhedrin member were considered almost sacred. Obviously, there was an overemphasis on the value of their opinions.  But in Jewish thinking, since Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, could He also successfully overthrow the Romans and annihilate the existing temple? They concluded it would be much better to kill Jesus and remain under Roman rule.

12.03.12c

 

“To unite the scattered children of God.”  John prophesied that the Jews would one day be restored. This pertained not only to the Jews who lived in the Promised Land, but also to those who were scattered abroad in many nations.  Since he did not place any limitations on the restoration of unity, it must be understood to mean both physical (return to Israel) and spiritual (acceptance of Jesus [Yeshua]) as Lord and Savior.[5] This interpretation, however, is a matter of debate. The early church made use of these prophetic words in a book titled The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, also known as the Didache. When the bread is broken,

 

Even as this bread is scattered across the mountains, and was brought into one, so let the Church be brought together from the ends of the earth into the kingdom.

Didache 9:4[6]  

 

[1].  The three messianic miracles are 1). Healing a Jewish leper. 2). The casting out of demons from someone who could not speak. 3). Healing a person who was born blind. See 06.03.08.Q2 “What were the three “messianic miracles” that first century Jews believed the messiah would perform?” See also Fischer, The Gospels in Their Jewish Context. (Lecture on CD/MP3). Week 10, Session 2.

 

[2]. Interviews in October, 1998.  See https://www.templeinstitute.org/ for more information on the Institute that has re-created the vessels and garments for the new temple.

 

[3]. Clarification in parenthesis mine.

 

[4]. A partial listing of an estimated 60 messianic pretenders is found in Appendix 25 “False Prophets, Rebels, Significant Events, And Rebellions That Impacted The First Century Jewish World.”

 

[5]. Mills and Michael, Messiah and His Hebrew Alphabet. 7.

 

[6]. The Didache is a book on church order that was written within a century of the life of Jesus. For more information, see 02.02.08.

 



12.03.13 JESUS GOES TO EPHRAIM[1]

Bill Heinrich  -  Dec 24, 2015  -  Comments Off on 12.03.13 JESUS GOES TO EPHRAIM[1]

12.03.13 Jn. 11:54 Ephraim

 

JESUS GOES TO EPHRAIM[1] 

54 Therefore Jesus no longer walked openly among the Jews but departed from there to the countryside near the wilderness, to a town called Ephraim. And He stayed there with the disciples.

[1]. Scholars have long questioned where was the location of Ephraim. The Christian West Bank village of Taybet (pronounced Tie-bay) claims to be the ancient village. It is located 18 miles northeast of Jerusalem and 7 miles west of modern Ramallah. But the village has no archaeological evidence to its claim. However, nearby is Khirbet el-Maqatir (the biblical Ai), an archaeological site since 1995 examined by the Associates for Biblical Research. While attempting to uncover possible evidence that it is the ancient city of Ai, a first century village was discovered with evidence that suggests it might be the first century village of Ephraim.  See Gordon Govier “The Mysteries of Khirbet el-Maqatir” Artifax 29:3 (Summer 2014) 3; and Clyde Billington “Christian Village Holds Tradition of Jesus’ Visit” Artifax. 29:3 (Summer, 2014) 3, 6. See also Scott Stripling, “Have We Walked in the Footsteps of Jesus?” Bible and Spade. 27:4 (Fall, 2014) 88-94, and Bryant G. Wood, “Remarkable New Discoveries at Ai.” Bible and Spade. 27:4 (Fall, 2014) 95-98 for further details. On a side note, Joshua 10:1-4 suggests a close relationship between the ancient city of Ai and Jerusalem, possibly because it was a border fortress for the city-state of Jerusalem.

 



12.03.14 TEN LEPERS HEALED

Bill Heinrich  -  Dec 24, 2015  -  Comments Off on 12.03.14 TEN LEPERS HEALED

12.03.14 Lk. 17:11-19 Between Samaria and Galilee  

 

TEN LEPERS HEALED   

 

11 While traveling to Jerusalem, He passed between Samaria and Galilee. 12 As He entered a village, 10 men with serious skin diseases met Him. They stood at a distance  13 and raised their voices, saying, “Jesus, Master, have mercy on us!”

14 When He saw them, He told them, “Go and show yourselves to the priests.” And while they were going, they were healed.

15 But one of them, seeing that he was healed, returned and, with a loud voice, gave glory to God. 16 He fell face down at His feet, thanking Him. And he was a Samaritan.   

17 Then Jesus said, “Were not 10 cleansed? Where are the nine? 18 Didn’t any return to give glory to God except this foreigner?” 19 And He told him, “Get up and go on your way. Your faith has made you well.”

 

Jesus would soon go to Jerusalem for His final journey.  He was avoiding Herod Antipas who desired to kill Him as he killed John the Baptist.  He was also avoiding the Sanhedrin, until the appointed day and hour when He would give up His life.  It was during this time when He encountered the ten lepers. The context assumes that nine men were Jewish, since Jesus told all of them to see the priests to be declared “cleansed” (Gk. katharizo)[1] A dreaded disease such as this would make men of like affliction live together for their common good, even though they would have despised and hated each other, if they were healthy.

 

Lepers were social outcasts. Everyone feared they might contract the disease.[2]  In fact, they were required by law to ring a bell or shout “unclean, unclean” whenever anyone approached them.  If any Jew came within two meters of them or within thirty meters downwind of a leper, the Jew was considered defiled and had to go through ritual purification in a mikvah. These lepers had heard of the reputation of Jesus and, together, they came to Him to be healed.  Once they received their healing, everyone left except the despised Samaritan who returned to Jesus to thank Him.[3] The Jewish lepers could go to the temple in Jerusalem to be declared “clean,” while the Samaritan had to see the Samaritan priest in Sheckem to be declared “clean.”[4] However, some scholars believe the Samaritan leper could have entered the Gentile Court of the temple and be declared “clean” by a Jewish priest.[5] Regardless, all ten experienced a messianic miracle.

 12.3.14a

 

“Between Samaria and Galilee.” Some scholars believe Jesus traveled through the valley of Beth Shean on this journey where He had the opportunity to minister to Greeks, Samaritans, as well as Jews.  It was the only Greek Decapolis city located west of the Jordan River.[6]

 

12.03.14.A. THE RUINS OF BETH SHEAN

12.03.14.A. THE RUINS OF BETH SHEAN.  The ruins of the Decapolis city of Beth Shean, also known as Scythopolis or Nyssa-Scythopolis, stand as a monument of a bygone civilization. It was originally settled by the tribe of Manasseh (Jos. 17:11-12; Judg. 1:27) and expanded under Greek domination. In the second century B.C., it was resettled by Jews, who renamed it during the Hasmonean rule.  This Jewish population was massacred during the revolt of A.D. 66-70.[7]  Photograph by the author.

 

[1]. A leper who has been healed was often not called “healed,” but “cleansed” because the disease was symbolic of sin. See also Vine, “Leprosy.” Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary. 2:364.

 

[2]. There were four kinds of people that were considered as good as dead, and it was believed that in all four situations their illness was a divine judgment. They were the blind, the leper, the poor, and the childless.

 

[3]. Pentecost, The Words and Works of Jesus Christ. 347-48.

[4]. Geikie, The Life and Words of Christ. 2:285.

 

[5]. Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica. 3:334-36.

 

[6]. Farrar, Life of Christ. 282.

[7]. Vamosh, Beit She’an: Capital of the Decapolis. 2-3.



12.03.15 COMING OF KINGDOM

Bill Heinrich  -  Dec 24, 2015  -  Comments Off on 12.03.15 COMING OF KINGDOM

12.03.15 Lk. 17:20-35, 37                             

 

            COMING OF KINGDOM

 

20 Being asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God will come, He answered them, “The kingdom of God is not coming with something observable; 21 no one will say, ‘Look here!’ or ‘There!’ For you see, the kingdom of God is among you.”

22 Then He told the disciples: “The days are coming when you will long to see one of the days of the Son of Man, but you won’t see it. 23 They will say to you, ‘Look there!’ or ‘Look here!’ Don’t follow or run after them. 24 For as the lightning flashes from horizon to horizon and lights up the sky, so the Son of Man will be in His day. 25 But first He must suffer many things and be rejected by this generation.

 

26 Just as it was in the days of Noah,

so it will it be in the days of the Son of Man: 

27 People went on eating, drinking,  

Marrying, and given in marriage

until the day Noah boarded the ark, 

and the flood came and destroyed them all.

 

28 It will be the same as it was in the days of Lot. 

People went on eating, drinking,

Buying, selling,

Planting, building. 

 

29 But on the day Lot left Sodom,  

fire and sulfur rained from heaven and destroyed them all.

 

30 It will be like that on the day the Son of Man is revealed. 31 On that day, a man on the housetop, whose belongings are in the house,

            must not come down to get them.

Likewise the man who is in the field

            must not turn back. 32 Remember Lot’s wife!

33 Whoever tries to make his life secure

            will lose it,

and whoever loses his life

            will preserve it.

34 I tell you,

on that night two will be in one bed:

            One will be taken and the other will be left.

35 Two women will be grinding grain together:

            One will be taken and the other left.

[36 Two will be in a field:

            One will be taken, and the other will be left.]”

37 “Where, Lord?” they asked Him. He said to them, Where the corpse is, there also the vultures will be gathered.”

 

“The kingdom of God is among you.” Some translations read “the kingdom of God is within you.”

The English words “among” and “within” are translated from the Greek adverb entos,  which usually means within. The Greek phrase entos humon can be translated to read within you, in your midst, or within your grasp.[1]  It appears that Jesus referred to all three definitions.  In this case, the word among is rather weak and does not fully compliment the meaning of the passage. For the Kingdom to be within you means that Jesus is in complete control of one’s life.

 

According to some theologians, the kingdom of God is “among you” now, but during the Millennial Reign of Jesus the Kingdom of God will be a political-religious kingdom.  This new Kingdom will be the life of God living within the believer. It could also be translated as meaning “in your midst,” or “among you.”[2]  In essence, Jesus said that His character was “within you.”  The gospels declare the main theme of Jesus is the Kingdom of God/Heaven, whereas in the rest of the New Testament the theme is Jesus. Of course, His character is the Kingdom of God within His believer.  If one desires to have the kingdom within, the life of Jesus must be within his heart.

 

The Son of Man will be in His day.”  Here Luke equated the Hebrew phrase Day of the Lord with Jesus’ return in judgment at the end of time. There will be the climactic battle known as the “great day of God Almighty” (Rev. 16:14). Then the forces of evil are destroyed by the Lord God Himself.  Most certainly, this is what John the Baptist had in mind when he spoke of the one who would follow him and bring judgment upon the earth.

 

As stated previously, and this point is critical, the phrase Son of Man, or Bar Enosh in Aramaic,[3] in the book of Enoch is a figure, who is waiting in heaven until God sends him to earth where he would establish his kingdom and rule over it. This book was common knowledge to the Jewish people, so when Jesus used the phrase about Himself, He was clearly claiming to be the long-awaited Messiah. That is quite interesting, because the book of Enoch was written in the Inter-Testamental period, and the expressions of “Son of Man” and “Son of God,” when used of Christ, do so to express His deity.[4] The mystery that remains veiled is this: How did the writer of Enoch know this?

12.03.15a

 

“Just as it was in the days of Noah.”  Noah was the spokesman for God to a depraved world that was determined to seek its own pleasures, while Lot (v. 28) was a preacher of righteousness in a sexually depraved culture.[5]  Each man gave warning to the people of their cities.  The few who placed their faith in the Most High God were saved, while the others died in the predicted destruction.  This phrase has a reference to the judgment that followed Noah and Lot. Jesus essentially said that people would be busy pursuing the daily events of life with no thought of God, Judgment Day, or eternity.

 

 

12.03.15.Q1  Why did Jesus tell His followers to remember Lot’s wife (Lk. 17:32)?

“Remember Lot’s wife!”  To protect them from death, Lot and his family were personally led out of Sodom by two angels (Gen. 19).  As they fled, Lot’s wife looked back and instantly became a pillar of salt. Her name is not recorded in Scripture, but according to the ancient Book of Jasher (19:52), it was Abo (Edith).[6]

 

When God told them to flee, it was to remove them from the wickedness of Sodom, its pending destruction, and to look forward to a better future.  However, a moment of disobedient hesitation cost her life. The lesson is that one cannot have a passion for both the world and for God.  The comment “remember Lot’s wife” was a serious warning to not be part of a degeneratinge world, but to keep one’s focus on Christ Jesus. Similar warnings are found in the parable of the ten virgins, two women at the grinding stone, etc. The warning to be prepared to meet God and give an account of one’s life has not changed.[7] Clearly, it was never intended to be a point of humor.

 

“Where the corpse is, there also the vultures will be gathered.” This is an excellent example where the context of a statement presents the definition of a word.  In the Greek language, the same term is used for eagle and for vulture. However, since eagles would not eat a corpse, the meaning is clearly vulture.[8]

 

In this narrative, the dead body represents the nation of Israel and the vultures represent the Gentile nations that one day will come against the Jewish state. Some scholars believe that prior to the final battle of the ages, many Jews will flee to the ancient city of Petra (Jer. 49:13-14). It is also where many believe Jesus will return with His heavenly army to save them from destruction.[9]

 

12.03.15.A. ROOFTOP LIVING AS IN ANCIENT TIMES

12.03.15.A. ROOFTOP LIVING AS  IN ANCIENT TIMES.  This modern home in Israel has an area on the roof designated for resting, relaxation, and family time, as was done in Bible times. This is typical of many homes throughout the Middle East today.  Photograph by the author.

 

 

12.03.15.B. A PAIR OF GRINDING STONES

12.03.15.B. A PAIR OF GRINDING STONES.  This crude kitchen took, a pair of basalt grinding stones, was typical of household implements of the first century that Jesus probably referred to when He said that two women would be grinding grain, and one would be taken.  Grain was placed in the center hole.  As the top stone was turned, the grain crushed against the bottom stone. The crushed grain, called flour, fell out of the edges of the stones.  Photograph by the author.

 

[1]. Lang, Know the Words of Jesus. 239-40.    

 

[2]. Pentecost, The Words and Works of Jesus Christ. 349.

[3]. Wijngaards, Handbook to the Gospels. 44.

 

[4]. Jn. 3:13; 5:27; 6:27; cf. Mt.26:63-64; Tenney, The Gospel of John. 105.

 

[5]. Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus. 340.    

[6]. Jordan. Who’s Who in the Bible. 237. That narrative has generally been perceived with less respect than is deserved – almost with a point of humor.

 

[7]. There are numerous Old Testament warnings as well, such as Ezekiel 3:17-21.

 

[8]. Bock, Jesus According to Scripture. 293.

 

[9]. See also Micah 2:12-13; Isa. 34:1-7; 63:1-6.



12.03.16 THE PERSISTENT WIDOW AND UNRIGHTEOUS JUDGE

Bill Heinrich  -  Dec 24, 2015  -  Comments Off on 12.03.16 THE PERSISTENT WIDOW AND UNRIGHTEOUS JUDGE

12.03.16 Lk. 18:1-8

 

THE PERSISTENT WIDOW AND UNRIGHTEOUS JUDGE 

 

1  He then told them a parable on the need for them to pray always and not become discouraged:

 

A 2 There was a judge in a certain town

       who didn’t fear God

or respect man. 

 

B 3 And a widow in that town

 kept coming to him saying,

‘Give me justice against my adversary.’

 

A’ 4 For a while he was unwilling, 

but later he said to himself, ‘Even though I don’t fear God

or respect man,

 

B’ 5 yet because this widow keeps pestering me,

I will give her justice,

                                                  so she doesn’t wear me out by her persistent coming.’”

 

6 Then the Lord said, “Listen to what the unjust judge says. 7 Will not God grant justice to His elect who cry out to Him day and night? Will He delay to help them? 8 I tell you that He will swiftly grant them justice. Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will He find that faith on earth?”

 

Literary Style.[1]  In this poetic parable, stanzas A and A’ each focus on a judge, God, and man, while the other stanzas focus on the widow and her vindication.

 

In this narrative Jesus taught the importance of persistence prayer. The lesson is that if an unrighteous judge will make a favorable decision, how much more will God provide for those whom He loves?   Historically, according to the Talmud, in the larger villages there were two stipendiary magistrates, known as Dayyaney Gezeloth.[2]  They were constantly on duty and had become known for their arbitrariness and covetousness.[3] They were not beyond bribery, and so “for a dish of meat, they would pervert justice.”[4] They were employed by the Herodian family and, as such, they were not permitted to have any other occupation.  They had to be available to the public at a moment’s notice. When anyone had a problem that needed a scholarly decision, he would highly prefer to ask a rabbi, and if none could be found, then ask a carpenter.[5]  However, if in a desperate situation, he could also go to a magistrate, appointed by Herod, who was, most likely, a despised Roman sympathizer.  This points to two interesting features concerning the Babylonian Talmud:

 

  1. It presents interesting insights into Jewish social life (in this case the legal system) in the Holy Land, not Babylon, prior to the destruction of the temple, and

 

  1. It discredits the argument that since it was written at a late date, it should be not be considered as a source for biblical study on Jewish life and culture.

 

“There was a judge … who didn’t fear God.”  The literal phrase reads “He felt no shame before the people.”[6]  The phrase does not mean that the judge was not afraid of God, but he had no respect for God’s authority.  A similar statement is found in Exodus 1:8 where Moses wrote that a new king did not know about Joseph.  The fact is that Joseph, who was the second highest ruler of Egypt for eighty years, helped the Egyptians survive a terrible drought and became a national hero.  Of course the new king certainly had heard of him, but he had no respect or regard for him.  The same is true of the judge in this parable. It was to a Dayyaney Gezeloth judge who didn’t fear God that the persistent woman came for justice.[7]  Some scholars believe that this judge was not a Jew, but a Roman and this was a Roman court, not a Jewish one.[8]  That is possible, or he could have been  a Hellenistic Jew.  Nonetheless, the persistence of the widow eventually resulted in her receiving due justice. This parable clearly reflected the passage in Psalm,

 

The Lord protects foreigners and helps the fatherless and the widow, but He frustrates the ways of the wicked.

 Psalm 146:9

 

“His elect.” (Gk. eklekton) The chosen ones are those who will be in the victorious army of Jesus at the end of history.[9] The parable Jesus told was reflective of a well-known parable that was written some two centuries earlier in a book known as The Wisdom of Ben Sirach.[10] Again, Jesus taught from the known to the unknown; teaching from what the people were already familiar with to what He wanted them to learn. Since they did not have notepads, iPads, or books, all instruction was memorized – a skill that was well developed in the Jewish culture. Note the words of this Inter-Testamental wisdom book,

 

            Do not the tears run down her cheek

   as she cries out against him who has caused them to fall?

 

He whose service is pleasing to the Lord will be accepted,

   and his prayer will reach to the clouds.

 

            The prayer of the humble pierces the clouds,

   and he will not be consoled until it reaches the Lord;

            he will not desist until the Most High visits him,

   and does justice for the righteous and exercises judgment.

 

            And the Lord will not delay, neither will he be patient with them,

   till he crushes the loins of the unmerciful and repays vengeance on the nations;

            till he takes away the multitude of the insolent,

   and breaks the scepters of the unrighteous;

 

            till he repays man according to his deeds,

   and the works of men according to their devices;

            till he judges the case of his people

   and makes them rejoice in his mercy.

 

            Ben Sirach 35:15-19[11]

 

In the poetic writings of Ben Sirach was a popular and similar motif that reflects the prayers of the humble and the rewards that will fall upon the righteous. In this narrative, the judgment of God is portrayed as being brutal on the Gentiles, but in response by Jesus, no judgment was mentioned. Yet there is an unmistakable awareness that all will one day give an account before the Judge of the Universe. At this point in His ministry, and at this time in church history, mercy and forgiveness is extended to those who repent, place their faith in Christ Jesus, and live according to biblical principles. This narrative underscores an important point: Jesus told stories in various forms to explain His theology. Therefore, understanding the language and culture of the Storyteller is critical.

12.03.16a

 

“Will He find that faith on earth?”  The essential question of Jesus can easily be overlooked. When He returns, will He find people of faith – people who live their daily lives being focused on obediently doing His will knowing that He will care and provide for them?

[1]. Bailey, Poet and Peasant. Part II, 131; Fleming, The Parables of Jesus. 72.

[2]. See Dayyaney Gezeloth in Appendix 26.

 

[3]. Babylonian Talmud, Kethub 104b.

[4]. Edersheim, The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah. 674.

[5]. Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica. 3:53.

 

[6]. Bailey, Jesus through Middle Eastern Eyes. 263.

 

[7]. Pentecost, The Words and Works of Jesus Christ. 351; Barclay, “Luke.” 221-22.

 

[8]. Lang, Know the Words of Jesus. 93-94.

 

[9]. Mt. 24:31; Mk. 13:27; Rev. 17:14; See also Liefeld, “Luke.” 8:1000.

[10]. A/k/a Ben Sirach, the Wisdom of Ben Sirach, or Ecclesiasticus.

 

[11]. Metzger, The Apocrypha of the Old Testament. 174.



12.03.17 THE PRAYERS OF THE SELF-RIGHTEOUS PHARISEE AND TAX COLLECTOR

Bill Heinrich  -  Dec 24, 2015  -  Comments Off on 12.03.17 THE PRAYERS OF THE SELF-RIGHTEOUS PHARISEE AND TAX COLLECTOR

12.03.17 Lk. 18:9-14

 

THE PRAYERS OF THE SELF-RIGHTEOUS PHARISEE AND TAX COLLECTOR 

 

9 He also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous and looked down on everyone else:

 

A 10 “Two men went up to the temple complex to pray,

one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. 

 

B 11 The Pharisee took his stand and was praying like this:

‘God, I thank you that I’m not like other people  

 

C greedy, unrighteous, adulterers,

or even like this tax collector. 

 

D 12  I fast twice a week;

I give a tenth of everything I get.’

 

C’ 13 “But the tax collector, standing far off, 

would not even raise his eyes to heaven,

 

        B’ but kept striking his chest and saying,

        ‘God, turn Your wrath from me —  a sinner!’

 

A’ 14 I tell you, this one,

went down to his house justified rather than the other;

because everyone who exalts himself will be humbled,

but the one who humbles himself will be exalted.”

 

Literary style.[1]  Following the introduction is stanza A, in which there are two men, a Pharisee and a tax collector, both sinners.  In line A’, there are two men; the tax collector is made righteous and the Pharisee is not.  This is followed by the conclusion, which is a mini-poem.   In stanzas, B and B’ are two different manners of prayer: one is arrogant and the other repentant.  In stanzas C and C’ is the image of the tax collector who first compared himself to other sinners and then compared himself to an almighty God.  In line D is the self-righteous attitude of the Pharisee who kept all the Mosaic laws, which did not make him holy before God.

 

Many parables are based on Old Testament stories and themes.  For example, the Pharisee and tax collector of Luke 18:9-14 is related to the judgment and joyous restoration of Isaiah 66:1-6.[2] In this case, the Pharisee is not thanking God for anything, but rather, is telling God what he personally has accomplished. In the meantime, the repentant tax collector beats his chest in crying to God for mercy.  But that is more than a comparison of two men, it also warns the disciples of the danger of pride in their ministry.

 

Jesus again teaches that true righteousness is available for everyone and those who are in religious authority also need salvation. Salvation was/is a matter of the honest heart coming before God and pleading mercy, forgiveness, and a desire to live a repentant life. People remembered this teaching, because it was so radical from what they were accustomed to, and the words of Jesus were carefully spoken in poetic form for ease of remembrance by the listeners.  Most certainly everyone remembered the rebuke God gave the Israelites during the ministry of Isaiah, because they had fasted without a changed life (Isa. 38:1-7; cf. Mt. 6:16-18).

“I fast twice a week.” The Pharisees were known for fasting twice a week.[3]  The Talmud recorded the Jews fasted Mondays and Thursdays and this narrative has an interesting insight into the making and breaking of vows:

 

If a man undertook to fast on Mondays and Thursdays throughout the year and any of the festive days enumerated in the Scroll of Fasts happens to fall on those days, then if his vow was made previous to our decree his vow overrides our decree, but if our decree was made before his vow then our decree overrides his vow.

 

Babylonian Talmud, Ta’anith 12b

 

Mondays and Thursdays were also the local market days in Jerusalem, when many people traveled to the city to buy fresh food and other commodities. Hence, the Pharisees were able to make the greatest impact on the community by advertising their self-righteous piety. It is interesting to see how the primitive church carried on the tradition of fasting. The Didache, which was written as early as the mid-90s, states that Jewish believers fasted on Wednesdays and Fridays.

 

Let your fasts not take place with those of the wicked.  They fast on Monday and Thursday; you, though, should fast on Wednesday and Friday.

 

Didache 8:1

 

Clearly, they continued the tradition but refused to be identified with the leading Pharisees, whom they saw as being responsible for the judgment of Jerusalem.  The early church exploded with this kind of dedication and obedience toward God. It always played an important function in Jewish piety – and this was carried over into early Christianity.

 

“Kept striking his chest and saying, ‘God, turn Your wrath from me — a sinner!’ The tax collector approached God with a dire sense of need and humility. The original Greek for a sinner is as if the tax collector recognized himself to be the worst of all sinful humanity.[4] He realized that only God could give him mercy. This simple phrase epitomizes the Sermon on the Mount phrase, “poor in spirit.” The collector’s spirit was impoverished and only God could help him. In essence, he is profoundly humble.[5]

In this parable, Jesus again elevates the meaning of righteousness. The cultural meaning is for one to observe the biblical code of ethics, such as giving to the poor or expressing kindness, especially in situations when it would not be expected.  However, Jesus introduced a new definition of righteousness – that is to have an ongoing relationship with God. The self-righteous attitude is one whereby one assumes he or she has a relationship with God, often by some form of legalism, when in fact that relationship does not exist. Righteousness (Gk. dikaiosyne) is defined by a number of terms such as uprightness, upright, just acquitted[6]  or as one might say in a simplified manner, “as if I never sinned.” In the parable, the self-righteous Pharisee, encumbered with legalistic laws, believed he was in right relationship with God while the tax collector passionately desired the right relationship.

[1]. Bailey, Poet and Peasant. Part II, 142; Fleming, The Parables of Jesus. 39.

[2]. Three other examples of Jesus’ parables that are based upon Old Testament are as follows: 1) Luke 15:4-7 the parable of the Good shepherd is based on Psalm 23, 2), the prodigal son of Luke 15:11-32 is related to Jacob’s life in Gen. 27:1 – 36:8, and 3) the two builders of Luke 6:46-49 is related to Isaiah 28:14-18.

 

[3]. Mt. 6:6; 9:14; Lk. 5:33; Jn. 7:18; Acts 27:9.

 

[4]. Barclay, “Luke.” 224.

 

[5]. Fischer, The Gospels in Their Jewish Context. (Lecture on CD/MP3). Week 4, Session 1.

 

[6]. Brown, “Righteousness, Justification.” 3:352-54.



  • Chapters