Unit 08 – Topical Issues

08.03.03 THE PRINCIPLE OF GIVING ALMS

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 07, 2016  -  Comments Off on 08.03.03 THE PRINCIPLE OF GIVING ALMS

08.03.03 Mt. 6:2-4

 

THE PRINCIPLE OF GIVING ALMS

2 So whenever you give to the poor, don’t sound a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be applauded by people. I assure you: They’ve got their reward! 3 But when you give to the poor, don’t let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4 so that your giving may be in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you.

 08.03.03.Q1 Why isn’t there a strong teaching on tithing in the New Testament? 

The doctrine of tithing has been challenged by some throughout church history and defended by others, just as it is today.[1] Those who claim it is not necessary do so, in part, citing lack of a direct command by Jesus or the apostles to continue it. So why doesn’t support exist in the New Testament?

At this time tithing was a well-established religious and cultural tradition that did not need to be explained, just as the need for giving alms was not addressed.[2]  The belief was so strong, that no one would have thought of going to the synagogue, if he had not first prepared his tithe.  Note the words from the Oral Law:

 

A man says within his house when darkness is falling on the eve of Shabbath; “Have you tithed?”

Mishnah, Shabbath 2.7[3]

 

The Pharisees were known for tithing. In Luke 11:42, for example, Jesus stated that the Pharisees carefully tithed various garden spices, but neglected the justice and love of God.  In the section of the Mishnah known as the Maaseroth (meaning “tithes”) is an extensive list of regulations of what to tithe and the “tithing season” of various crops.[4] The Jewish community was evidently in compliance with this biblical requirement.

The New Testament epistles never mention tithing because, in addition to the established tradition, voluntary offerings were sufficient for the needs of the church.  Since the early church was essentially Jewish, the members continued the practice of tithing they had been taught from childhood. In addition to the first tithe, there was a second tithe (Deut. 14:22).[5]  Known as the maaser sheni,[6]  this tithe was only on produce, crops, and livestock.[7] It was to be given or spent only in Jerusalem[8]  when the family was there for a festival or other occasion.[9]  This second tithe could be spent on personal items or given to the poor, to a synagogue, or to the temple.[10]  When given to the poor, it was placed in a quppah, or poor basket.[11]  The quppah was the weekly allotment given to the poor and consisted of food and clothing. This biblical tradition continued in the primitive church as recorded in Acts 11:28-30 when Barnabas and the Apostle Paul sent relief to Jerusalem during the famine of A.D. 44-45.

The extra-biblical book of Tobit contributes an interesting insight to the tithing issue. From the early Alexandrius and Vaticanus versions of this Inter-Testamental book are the following comments:

 

6 I went to Jerusalem taking the first-fruits and the tithes of my produce and the first shearings, and gave them to the priests, the sons of Aaron, who served at the altar. 7 Of all my produce I gave a tithe to the sons of Levi who ministered in Jerusalem. And the second tithe I sold, and  in Jerusalem. 8 And the third [tithe] I gave to those to whom it was due.

Tobit 1:6-8[12]

 

It should be noted, however, that the second tithe was an annual obligation. Given the seven-year cycle of when fields were to remain uncultivated (lay fallow) in the seventh year, the second tithe was given on the fourth year of a new cattle herd, and on the produce of new trees and vines.[13] This tithe appears to have been given to the Levites, who in turn were to give a tithe of their tithe to the priests. However, it seems that in later Judaism, the definition for this use was broadened and the tithe was to be given or spent in Jerusalem. There was also a third tithe for charity and was paid in the third and sixth year of the sabbatical year (Deut. 14:28-29). Some scholars have debated the second and third tithe and have concluded it was the same tithe that was used for different purposes.[14] So the obvious question is, if the Jews and early Christians observed the second and third tithe, why would there not have been a first tithe?

Some scholars believe that tithing was also apparently an “indirect” factor when establishing a new synagogue. It was the common practice that a group of ten men could begin their own synagogue.[15] But why were ten men needed?  It has been suggested that it was because when ten men gathered their tithes, they could afford to employ a scribe who was qualified to teach the Scriptures.[16]  Since scribes were generally Pharisees, the Pharisees in effect, controlled or influenced all the synagogues in the country. In fact, after a boy had his bar mitzvah at the age of 13 years and one day of age, he could be one of those men,[17] although his income was rather meager. This clearly suggests that tithing was a commonly accepted practice. However, some scholars believe that in Galilee, women were permitted to be part of the ten members needed to establish a new synagogue, and they seldom were income earners.[18]

Unfortunately, certain wealthy priests were determined to obtain whatever tithes were due to them. Josephus said they even sent out armed servants to the threshing floors in order to take the priestly tithes by force;[19] these ungodly violent acts were recorded later in the Babylonian Talmud.[20] As a result, some lower-ranked priests had their tithes stolen and died of starvation because the “big men of the priesthood” took their wheat.[21] This was especially true in the year A.D. 45 when Claudius reigned, and a severe famine caused the price of grain to skyrocket.[22] The Pharisaic leaders and teachers in local synagogues suffered as much from their aristocratic leaders as did everyone else.[23] The difference between giving a tithe because it is a divine principle, and the tithing demanded by wicked religious leaders, could not have been more profound.[24]

Closing thoughts are as follows: Tithing was never questioned in the New Testament Period, it was simply a continuation of a well-established doctrine.  According to Jesus, love would ask, “How much can I give?” But legalism will ask, “How little can I give?”  This can be further demonstrated in what a pastor once said, “We make a living by what we get, but make a life by what we give.”  Tithing is, in reality, given to the Lord.

08.03.03a

 

The phrase, “Don’t sound a trumpet,” is an interesting double play on words.  According to the Mishnah,[25] almsgiving was supposed to be a strictly private affair, so much so that these monies were to be placed into the Chamber of Secrets or in the Chamber of Utensils, both of which were in the temple. As stated previously, the Pharisees who paraded their almsgiving were violating their own rules of righteousness. There are two considerations concerning this verse:

 

  1. In the Court of the Women at the temple there were thirteen trumpet-shaped vessels in which financial gifts were placed.[26] When a number of coins were dropped at the same time, the clanging sound became known as “the announcement” or the “sound [of] a trumpet” because the vessels were in the shape of a trumpet and made of copper.[27]

 

Herein is a classic example of Jewish expression and how it differs from modern onoes. The phrase “Court of the Women” was not for women only, as it would be assumed in modern Western thinking.  Rather, any Jewish person could enter this court, but it was the limit as to how far women could go, in that they were not permitted to get closer to the sacred temple.  Likewise, the Court of the Gentiles was open to everyone, but it was the limit of how far Gentiles could go within the temple.[28]

 

  1. The phrase, “Don’t sound a trumpet,” does not appear in rabbinic writings. Therefore, scholars believe it is reflective of the influential Greek culture. As such, in Greek theaters, the leading actor was introduced to the audience with the sound of trumpets. There is no evidence to suggest the Pharisees walked around the city carrying trumpets that were blown when they placed money in the collection vessels.

 

Jesus equated the method of giving alms by the leading Pharisees with the actors of a Greek theater, since the sound of trumpets was not permitted in the synagogues when alms were given.[29]

 

As stated previously in Matthew 6, Jesus spoke of the three pillars of faith:

 

  1. Giving tithes

 

  1. Giving alms

 

  1. Prayer and fasting

 

In the Mishnah Avot, Rabbi Simon ha Sadeek (Simon the Righteous), also spoke of three pillars of faith. These were

 

  1. Temple service,

 

  1. Acts of worship, and

 

  1. Deeds of love and kindness.

 

Notice the similarities.  Temple service was not only physical work around the facility, but also worship. Jesus refocused these and then added that alms are to be given in secret.   Furthermore, He stated that meaningless repetition was not a part of worship.

[1]. St. Cyprian (200-258) was the bishop of Carthage and wrote (De Unitate Ecclesias 23) the need to tithe because it was an unchanging divine principle that predates Moses (Gen. 14:20).

 

[2]. See additional rules on tithing in the Mishnah, Ma’aserot 1.1 and Moed Shabbath 4.7.

 

[3]. Josephus spoke of corrupt priests who stole the tithes from other priests in Antiquities, 20.9.2, found herein in, “A den of robbers,” 13.02.02. He also mentioned it in Antiquities 20.8.8 as found herein in “The chief priests” in 15.02.09. See additional rules on tithing in the Mishnah, Ma’aserot 1.1 and Moed Shabbath 4.7. The point is that tithing was a well-established practice.

 

[4]. Mishnah, Maaseroth; For tithing reasons, see Mishnah, Maaseroth 1.5.

[5]. Jubilees 32:8-14.

 

[6]. Mishnah, Maaser Sheni. 4.3-4.

[7]. Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus. 134. Not all Jewish writings indicate that the second tithe was on cattle herds, but mention crops and produce only.

 

[8]. Mishnah, Maaser Shemi  4.4-5.

 

[9]. Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus. 58, 102-03, 131, 134-35.  

 

[10]. Deut. 14:26; Mishnah, Maaser Sheni 2.1; Josephus, Antiquities, 4.8.8 (205); Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus. 102.  

 

[11]. Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus. 131.  

 

[12]. See also the book of Jubilees 32:8-14, which is dated to the early second century B.C.

 

[13]. Mishnah, Maaser Shemi  4.3-4; Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus. 134.  

 

[14]. Josephus, Antiquities 4.8.22;  Feinberg, “Tithe.” 5:757.

 

[15]. In fact, one Jewish source indicates that about this time Jerusalem had 460 synagogues and another sources stated 480 synagogues.  The difference in number was probably due to the different decades when the synagogues were counted.  Clearly, there were many synagogues in the Holy City.

 

[16]. Bookman, When God Wore Sandals. CD Trac 6 & 7.

 

[17]. Fruchtenbaum, The Jewish Foundation of the Life of Messiah: Instructor’s Manual. Class 6, page 8.

 

[18]. This is a minority view among scholars, but it is well known that Galilee promoted education for girls and the rabbis were not as restrictive there as those in Jerusalem.

 

[19]. Josephus, Antiquities 20.8.8 (181); 20.9.2 (206).

 

[20]. Babylonian Talmud, Pesahim 57a.

 

[21]. Another name for these priests was “men of violence.” See Josephus, Antiquities 20.8.8 (181); 20.9.2 (206);  Babylonian Talmud, Pesahim 57a;  Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus. 98, 106-07.

 

[22]. Josephus, Antiquities 3.15.3. Some scholars believe the price of grain increased thirteen times.

 

[23]. Golub, In the Days. 272-73.

 

[24]. Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus. 179-81, 190-97.

 

[25]. Mishnah, Shekalim 5:6.

[26]. Edersheim, The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah. 137.

[27]. Moseley, Yeshua: A Guide to the Real Jesus and the Original Church. 28.

 

[28]. Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica. 1:226.

 

[29]. Freeman, The New Manners and Customs of the Bible. 412-13.

 



08.03.04 THE PRINCIPLE OF A MODEL PRAYER (The Lord’s Prayer)

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 07, 2016  -  Comments Off on 08.03.04 THE PRINCIPLE OF A MODEL PRAYER (The Lord’s Prayer)

08.03.04 Mt. 6:5-15

 

THE PRINCIPLE OF A MODEL PRAYER

 

5 “Whenever you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites, because they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by people. I assure you: They’ve got their reward! 6 But when you pray, go into your private room, shut your door, and pray to your Father who is in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you. 7 When you pray, don’t babble like the idolaters, since they imagine they’ll be heard for their many words.

 

8 Don’t be like them, because your Father knows the things you need before you ask Him.

 

9 “Therefore, you should pray like this:

 

Our Father in heaven,

Your name be honored as holy.

10 Your kingdom come,

Your will be done

on earth as it is in heaven

11 Give us today our daily bread

12 And forgive us our debts,

as we also have forgiven our debtors

13 And do not bring us into temptation,  

but deliver us from the evil one.

[For Yours is the kingdom and the power
and the glory forever. .]

 

14 “For if you forgive people their wrongdoing,

         your heavenly Father will forgive you as well.

15 But if you don’t forgive people,

         your Father will not forgive your wrongdoing.

 

The elements of this model prayer tell as much about us as about God.[1] It is commonly called the “Lord’s Prayer,” but in reality, it is the Disciple’s Prayer. Virtually every element of this prayer has a connection with Jewish prayer tradition.[2] For example, Matthew 6:13 is echoed in Benediction 6 and verse 11 is echoed in Benediction 9 of the Eighteen Benedictions.[3] Matthew 6:9-13 has echoes from Proverbs 30:7-9. Yet amazingly, Jesus omitted the weekly requirements of scheduled fasts and ritual prayers that were so important to the Pharisees, especially those of the School of Shammai.

The Lord’s Prayer has been used to establish the pattern for prayer throughout church history.  There are two forms of it (Mt. 6:9-13; Lk. 11:2-4) and the early church fathers had a third version of it in chapter 8 of the Didache.[4]  All three versions are simple, to the point, and are reflective of the prayers found in the rich Jewish traditions.  Jesus desired to have His disciples continue the important points of the Jewish faith, while eliminating the dead traditional elements.  Scholars believe the model prayer was composed entirely of selections of various liturgical prayers already in use in daily life.  This is opposite to the spontaneous prayers often believed today to be the only ones heard by God.

For centuries it was the custom to pray three times a day, just as observant Muslims today face Mecca and pray five times a day.  David prayed three times a day (Ps. 55:17) and Daniel, while in Babylon did likewise, facing Jerusalem (Dan. 6:10).  Prayer was always a dedicated feature of Orthodox Judaism. The model prayer was prayed three times every day by the first Jewish believers[5] when the temple trumpets blew signaling the formal times of prayer. These were as follows:

 

  1. The morning prayers, called the Shacharit, at 9:00 o’clock, occurred at the time of the morning sacrifice in the temple. It was at this time of prayer that the Holy Spirit fell on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:15).
  2. The 12:00 o’clock noon prayer was known as the Mincha, also known as the “sixth hour, “when Peter prayed (Acts 10:9).[6]

 

  1. The afternoon (also known as the “evening”) prayer was the Maariv at 3:00 o’clock,[7] known as the “ninth hour.”[8] Peter and John went to pray in the temple at the Maariv. It was also at this time that the “God-fearing” Greek Cornelius prayed when he saw his vision (Acts 10:3-5). Notice that Jesus never commented about prayers at specific times, as this was the Jewish custom.  He did not forbid nor discourage specific prayer times.

 

The custom of organized prayers at set times has led some modern students to conclude that private prayers were minimal, but that was hardly the case. In Judaism, there was an emphasis on daily private and family prayers.  The disciples certainly knew how to pray privately because during childhood, they learned to pray for the daily needs of life as well as the liturgical prayers for the synagogue.  They asked Jesus this question because they saw the dynamic results of prayer in His life and desired the same results. There are a number of points that Jesus taught them.

 

  1. All prayers are to go to God the Father, not to Jesus or the Holy Spirit.

 

  1. Prayer is to honor God and

 

  1. Prayers are to be prayed on behalf of those working in the Kingdom of God (missionaries, pastors, etc.).

 

  1. There are prayers for one’s own needs as well as

 

  1. The forgiveness of sins and spiritual welfare.

 

On an important side note, when the Apostle Paul directed his followers to pray “without ceasing,” “continually,” or “always,” he did not mean uninterrupted prayer, but to observe the regular hours of prayer as had been the Jewish custom. The early church recited the Shema morning and evening[9] along with their morning and evening prayer – that was our Lord’s Prayer along with anything else that concerned them. At noon they prayed again but did not necessarily recite the Shema.  This was not a legalistic issue, but one that righteous Jewish believers wanted to do. In addition to the Lord’s Prayer, they prayed for whatever else concerned them.[10]

“You must not be like the hypocrites.”  Jesus reflected upon the Greek theater where plays were popular.  The Greek word hypokrites (5695) meaning actor identifies the person who is not his real self, but portrays himself differently for the approval of the audience.[11] The subject is discussed elsewhere,[12] but the key point is that Jesus wants His followers to pray with honesty and sincerity, so prayers can be answered.[13] Jerusalem had a theater, much to the chagrin of orthodox religious leaders and, therefore, everyone understood the role actors played.[14]   The leading Pharisees and the entire class of Sadducees played an important part of the ministry environment of Jesus, and He hated their hypocritical attitudes. He called them “hypocrites” nearly two dozen times, primarily for the following several reasons:[15]

 

  1. The core issue was that they pretended to be religious when they were not. They equated legalism with righteousness in the way some people today equate religious conservatism equal to a relationship with Jesus. The hypocrite was one who, in the name of religion, broke God’s laws.
  2. Religious leaders whose lives are filled with hypocrisy do incredible harm to others who look to their leaders as a role model of life (Mt. 23:13-15).
  3. They were arrogant and prideful – the same sin that prompted the downfall of Satan (Isa. 14:12-15). This attitude places one’s self above the needs and authority of God.
  4. Hypocrisy, with its arrogance, is in opposition to the character and purpose of God (Mt. 22:29-33). God calls the sinner to repentance while hypocrites condemn sinners, but then perform sins of their own behind closed doors.
  5. The hypocrite was one for whom goodness was “theatrical goodness” (Mt. 6:2, 16). They were seriously concerned as to how they appeared to others, and could not care less how God saw them.
  6. A hypocrite was one who was prideful, arrogant and often bitter, but hid his true feelings under a coat of deceptive piety.
  7. The result is that eventually the hypocrite becomes blind to the truth, believing that his own opinions are truth. He then leads others astray.[16]

The result is that eventually the hypocrite is a man of divine condemnation (Mt. 24:51). In the New Testament there is no sin more strongly condemned than hypocrisy, and likewise in secular culture.[17]  The religious leaders loved to pray in public where everyone could admire their fine speech and sense of holiness.  Note that Jesus participated in public prayers which was a common practice in the synagogues and has continued in the church.[18]

When you pray, go into your private room.” Jesus emphasized private prayer to develop a private relationship with God. The Greek word for “private room” is tameion, which means a room.[19]  Jesus simply indicated that when you pray you should be in a secluded area. It was commonly believed that when a man prayed, he went to a private area, wrapped his prayer shawl around his head, thereby shutting out the world and prayed.   During His ministry, Jesus would at times retreat to a private area on a mountain where He could be away from the crowds to pray.

This tradition is centuries old, when the Jews, then known as the Children of Israel, wandered in the desert, they had a large tabernacle that functioned as their temple.  Since not all the men could enter the tabernacle tent to pray, each man covered his head with a prayer shawl, creating his own private “tabernacle,” in which he could pray to God. Therefore, when Jesus said one should go to his “room” to pray, the cultural context means he covered his head with his prayer shawl and privately conversed with God. Some translations use the term “closet” even though closets did not exist at this time.

When people pray, just as in worship, they are to pray in spirit and in truth.  God, who sees people as they really are, desires to have them come to Him in prayer so He can transform them into His image. He never intended to tell His disciples what to pray, but how to pray.  To teach them how to pray, He reflected upon some prayers with which they were already familiar.

 

“Don’t babble like the idolaters.” The following examples most probably refer to this phrase:

 

  1. This statement was reflective of the worshippers of Baal on Mount Carmel (1 Kg. 8:36) and the worshippers of Diana in the amphitheater at Ephesus who yelled and screamed for two hours (Acts 19:34). Pagan incantations heaped up names of gods hoping that one would respond (1 Kg. 18:26-29; Acts 17:33; 19:11-20). In addition, many magical papyri have been discovered with repetitive prayers to God and other deities. Those who prayed did so for hours.[20]

 

  1. The phrase also has implications of rehearsed lines spoken by theater actors in Jerusalem. Some scholars have suggested the phrase “babbling” was speaking in tongues to demonic spirits.

 

It should be noted that at this time, silent prayers did not exist,[21]  neither did silent reading as both skills were not developed for another three or four centuries.  So wherever there was a prayer group, it was literally a joyful noise unto our Lord.

“Our Father in heaven, Your name be honored as holy. Your kingdom come.”  There is little question that it was astounding when Jesus used the Aramaic word Abba for Father, just as He probably used imma for momma or mamma.[22]  It was commonly used in reference to one’s earthly father and one’s local rabbi, which is why it is translated as Daddy,[23]  although abi is the best translation for father.[24] It goes beyond formalities and adds a personal and affectionate element to one’s prayer life. Yet those first four words are a balance of love and power. Only a few decades later during the time of the apostles, Rabbi Jonathan ben Zakkai, the last disciple of the famous Rabbi Hillel who taught between the years A.D. 50 – 80, used this phrase.[25]

However, to address God in heaven in this manner was a new concept.  A standard introduction to a Jewish prayer always began with, “Our Father in heaven.” This was to recognize their personal worshipful relationship to a holy God. This phrase was reflective of another prayer known as the Kaddish, which began, “Magnified and hallowed be His great name in the world …. And may He establish His kingdom in your lifetime and in your days … quickly and soon.”[26] The phrase, “Your kingdom come.” is not a command, but rather, it has the connotation of “may it be” or “let it be.” The same Hebrew expression, found in 1 Chronicles 28:4-5 is relative to the Davidic Kingdom when ruled by his son Solomon and the phrase is translated “to cause to reign.”[27]

 

“Your name be honored as holy.” In the Old Testament there are two ways that God’s name is sanctified.

 

  1. The first is by the lifestyle of a community of believers and

 

  1. By the way God responds to people. This phrase is an appeal that God’s name would be revered regardless of what we do.

 

Finally, the phrase, “Hallowed be your name,” (KJV) is a poetic parallel to “your kingdom come, your will be done on earth,” because God’s name will be hallowed when His will is done.  The key Greek word is hagiazo (37), which means to make holy.[28] Another translation is, “May you sanctify your name by the way I obey your will and in the way I submit myself to your kingdom and commandments.”

The location of the phrase indicates the “kingdom” is marked by acknowledging and referencing the holiness of God with doing His will and service.  The clause that follows points to the perfection which believers are to attain, that being to do the perfect will of God as He would have it done in heaven.  This has at times been construed to mean that anything other than the “perfect will” is sin.  But that is hardly the case, as the grace of God works with people to do His will.  It was never intended to be a paralyzing command. This kingdom is within the believer and reflects the attitude we are to have that honors God and our desire to be in complete obedience to him.


08.03.04a

“Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.” Our submission to Him is our confession.  Near the end of the first century, Rabbi Eliezer was noted for reciting a prayer that stated, “Do your will in heaven above and give peace to those who fear you below.”[29] There was also a common belief that when Israel did the will of God, His name would be sanctified before the nations.  Conversely, if Israel did not do the will of God, His Name would be profaned among the Gentile nations.

 

Notice that Jesus did not tell His disciples to pray, “If it be your will.” Rather, He taught them to think and pray biblically and to apply the Scripture to their lives (obedience).  He knew that whatever was to be done on earth was first accomplished in heaven. The prime example of this occurred when He was in the Garden of Gethsemane and death was only a few hours away.  It was then He prayed that His incredible sacrifice would be accomplished as was foreordained in heaven (Lk. 22:42).

 

“Give us today our daily bread.”  Our petition is to God, and our faith is in God, who provides for all of our needs.  This statement is an echo of the mealtime prayer as follows:

 

Blessed are you, O Lord our God, King of the universe, who feeds the whole world with your goodness . . . you give food to all mankind.  Through your goodness, food has never failed us: O may it never fail us forever and forever.

 

Jewish Mealtime Prayer[30]  

 

The term bread refers to the following:[31]

 

  1. It is synonymous for all food, not just baked bread.

 

  1. It is representative of Jesus Himself.

 

  1. It is representative of Scripture

 

To pray the Disciple’s Prayer is to invoke all three meanings into one’s prayer life.

 

“And forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors.” The key idea clearly is about forgiveness. Through Jesus we are forgiven (Gk. aphiesthai 918), from whatever sin separates us from God.[32]  The term has a wide variety of meanings, including an undeserved release of obligation, punishment, and other penalties that could be required.  It is by His love, grace, and mercy that we are forgiven if we are repentant.

 

Our confession and His grace are sufficient to forgive us, as we are obedient and compassionate to forgive others.[33]  Another way of saying this is “forgive us of our sins (Gk. for debts is opheilema 3783)[34] in proportion that we forgive the sins of others.” This portion of the Lord’s Prayer is reflective of the sixth benediction of the Eighteen Benedictions, or Shemoneh ‘esreh,[35] that Jews commonly prayed.  It stated, “Forgive us, our Father, for we have sinned against you; blot out our transgressions from before your eyes.  Blessed are you, O Lord.” [36] The phrase, “forgive our debtors” is an echo of a common teaching as found in Ben Sirach.[37]

 

“Forgive the wrong of your neighbor, and then your sins will be forgiven when you pray.”

 

Ben Sirach 28:2

 

Matthew used the Hebrew word debts while Luke, writing in Greek, used the word sins. The difference is insignificant. The English words sins and debts are both translated from the Aramaic word hoba.[38] Therefore when Jesus, who spoke He referred to sinners as well as to debtors. It should be remembered that each gospel writer wrote to a different audience.  The Jews understood that the word debts had a spiritual significance, which needed divine intervention in the form of forgiveness.[39]  The Greeks, to whom Luke was writing, would not have understood debts in that context, but they did understand the meaning of sins.[40]

About the year 170 B.C., the Jews, who were under the cruel dictatorship of Antiochus IV Epiphanes suffered severe persecution with possible extermination.[41]  It was a time when faithful Jews hated their brothers (Jewish anti-Semitism) who renounced their faith in order to escape persecution and death. God intervened in a miraculous manner through the Maccabean Revolt.  But in the midst of their suffering there was a righteous Jewish slave who wrote a magnificent passage on forgiveness.  A portion of his words is as follows:

 

He that takes vengeance will suffer vengeance from the Lord,

and he will firmly establish his sins.

Forgive your neighbor the wrong he has done,

and then your sins will be pardoned when you pray.

Does a man harbor anger against another,

and yet seek for healing from the Lord?

Does he have no mercy toward a man like himself,

and yet pray for his own sins?

If he himself, being flesh, maintains wrath,

who will make expiation for his sins?

Remember the end of your life and cease from enmity,

remember destruction and death and be true to the commandments.

Remember the commandments,

and do not be angry with your neighbor;

 

Ben Sirach 28:1-6[42]

 

The teaching similarities between the Ben Sirach and Jesus of Nazareth are at times profound.[43] That is because both are based upon the same Old Testament Scriptures – but obviously Sirach lacks divine inspiration.  St. Augustine made this insightful comment about the biblical phrase:

 

Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.   What if God should answer, “Why do you ask me to do what I promised, when you refuse to do what I have commanded?”

Augustine, The Lord’s Prayer Explained[44]  

 

08.03.04.Q1 Why did Jesus pray, “do not bring us into temptation,” (Mt. 6:13) when James said that God doesn’t tempt us (Jas. 1:13-14)?

The phrase in question is found in the Lord’s Prayer, “And do not bring us into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one.” The difficulty is obvious: Why would a holy and loving God want to lead anyone into sin, especially when James 1:13-14 assures us that God will not tempt anyone with evil?  This is another example of how a so-called “biblical difficulty” is the result of translation.  The word temptation would better be translated as testing or challenging situations, when one decides to pass or fail the test or situation that he or she faces.[45] Another interpretation is do not permit us to go.[46] The English word tempt always suggests a seduction to commit evil, but this is wrong.  The word does not mean surrender to evil, but it means a trial or test of any kind without a reference to moral quality.[47] The support for this interpretation is that the Greek word peirazein is better translated as test.[48] The testings of life are not intended to make anyone fall, but to strengthen them. An example is where God tested or tempted Abraham (Gen 22:1). The ultimate choice is ours and the prayer is to ask God to intervene on our behalf when we make decisions.

Clearly, God desires our dependence to be totally on Him. The phrase Jesus used was borrowed from liturgical morning and evening prayers that said “Cause me not to go into the hands of sin, and not into the hands of the transgression, and not into the hands of temptation, and not into the hands of dishonor.”[49]  A parallel passage in the Babylonian Talmud reads as follows,

 

            Bring me not into sin, or into iniquity, or into temptation, or into contempt.

           

            Babylonian Talmud, Berakoth 60b

 

To surrender to the temptation and commit sin is to succumb to the pressure of the test or trial.  In the prayer we are to ask God to keep us strong and keep us from failing.  Luke did not record the first phrase; Matthew gave us the second phrase, which is a restatement of the first, for God to deliver us from the evil one or to deliver us from what is evil.  The fact that the concept is stated twice is a Hebrew method of declaring its importance.  The same theme is found repeated in Matthew 26:41 and parallels, where one is to watch and pray to our heavenly Father that one does not fall under the pressure and trials of life.

An old Jewish prayer said, “Keep falsehood and lies far from me; give me neither poverty nor riches, but give me only my daily bread” (cf. Prov. 30:8).  The Hebraic word for bread (lehem) could also be translated “food,” and, in the cultural context, it means “all of man’s provisions.”[50] Jesus usually taught in Aramaic while the gospels were eventually written in Hebrew and Greek.  Modern students may discover that the Hebrew idioms, which present a richer and deeper meaning, are at times missing from the Greek translations.  This is a classic example of the importance of understanding the Jewish roots of Christianity.  In this case, when Jesus spoke of “bread,” He had reference to all the necessities of life.

The teachings of Jesus point to the desire of God to have people live in holiness.  This principle is taught throughout the Old Testament Scriptures and was demonstrated by Jesus.  By the power of the Holy Spirit, believers are able to obey the Word of God and not have sin dominate their lives.[51] This has become known as the doctrine of sanctification. In fact, the phrase “kingdom of God,” means that God rules in one’s life. The daily sins that one commits are removed by the blood of Jesus. That accomplishes holiness.

 

08.03.04.Q2 Is the Lord’s Prayer of Matthew 6:9-13 the same as in Luke 11:2-4?

These two prayers are similar, yet different. He wanted His followers to pray issues of the heart rather than memorized liturgical prayers that can easily become rote and meaningless. It must be remembered that Jesus taught His principles in many different settings.  Although His words may be slightly different from one location to another, the message was always the same.  Clearly Matthew and Luke quoted the same teaching in two different settings, so the quotations may not be identical. (See also 08.03.04.Q4 “Ipsissima Verba” and “Ipsissima Vox” below.)  Note the following:

 

Matthew 6:9-13 (NIV 1984)                         Luke 11:2-4 (NIV 1984)

                                                                        He said to them,

This, then, is how you should pray.                         “When you pray, say:

Our Father in heaven,                                                          Father,

Hallowed be your name.                                           Hallowed be your name

Your kingdom come.                                                Your kingdom come.

Your will be done

on earth as it is in heaven.

Give us this day our daily bread.                             Give us each day our daily bread

And forgive us our debts                                          And forgive us our sins

As we also have forgiven our debtors.                    for we also forgive anyone who sins against us.

And lead us not into temptation                               And lead us not into temptation.

But deliver us from the evil one.

 

Another example of quotations not being identical is found in the following:

 

Mt. 16:16 “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God!”

Mk. 8:29 “You are the Messiah!”

Lk. 9:20 “God’s Messiah!”

 

Unfortunately, while Jesus did not want this prayer to become liturgical, that is precisely what happened and has continued for centuries.  The model prayer was immediately adopted by His faithful followers.  It became a part of the messianic Jewish synagogue liturgy and, by the end of the first century it was incorporated in chapter 8 of the Didache, a/k/a The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles.  This instructional book was written to meet the needs of the early growing church.[52] Scholars believe that Jewish liturgy was modified and used in the first Jewish churches,[53] especially since the first churches were Jewish in nature and they were reflective of the Jewish traditions.

Some scholars have suggest that since Luke wrote to a Gentile audience, he probably omitted the expression “who is in heaven” because the Gentiles believed the god Zeus Olympus resided in heaven.[54]  No gospel writer wanted to confuse the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob with Zeus Olympus or any other pagan deity.  Modern students are seldom aware of the strong influences of Greek religions upon the Jewish culture.  The disciples never attacked other religions, but simply demonstrated that faith in Jesus was superior to other gods.

 

08.03.04.Q3 How can the Kingdom of God be a future event if it has already arrived?

Some passages state that the Kingdom of God is near or present,[55] while others state the kingdom will be a future event.[56] The two seeming contradictions are explained in that the Kingdom is near or present in part, but will be fulfilled at a future time. Consider these thoughts:

 

  1. The present Kingdom of God: The Kingdom of God is established in one’s life as Jesus transforms the character of that person into the image of God. That process is known as sanctification and, since God reigns within that person, the Kingdom has arrived even though it has not fully matured.[57]

 

  1. The future Kingdom of God: On the other hand, the Kingdom of God will come at a future time when Jesus rules and reigns over all nations from His throne in Jerusalem.[58] His followers do not know when He will return to establish His thousand-year Kingdom, but there are signs of its nearness.

 

Therefore, the Kingdom of God is present in those who have committed themselves to Him, and yet it is coming in a future time as a political entity. For additional details, see 06.01.08.Q2 “Is there a difference within the phrases Kingdom of God/Heaven?”  Both John the Baptist and Jesus preached repentance, but Jesus added the good news of the arrival of the Kingdom of God.

08.03.04b

 

The unique feature of the Kingdom of God/Heaven is that it is built upon the Old Testament. There are no less than 295 Old Testament quotations found in the New Testament, as well as a number of general references.

 

A Lesson in First Century Hermeneutics: 

08.03.04.X The Mystery of “Ipsissima Verba and Ipsissima Vox.”

Understanding these terms and their use in biblical times will bring considerable clarification for passages that do not seem to be in perfect agreement. The explanation begins with the following question:

 

08.03.04.Q4 What is the significance of verbal statements, “ipsissima verba” and “ipsissima vox?”

It is the opinion of this writer that the importance of these two phrases have grossly been understated, and unfortunately, sometimes not at all.  Knowing how people communicated clarifies many so-called biblical difficulties. In ancient times there were two ways of reporting what was said, and both were deemed accurate. Note the emphasis on “accurately repeating.”[59]

 

  1. The Latin phrase ipsissima verba (ip·sis·si·ma ver·ba) means the exact words verbatim, that were spoken.[60] The modern equivalent is an exact quotation.

 

  1. On the other hand, the Latin term ipsissima vox means the exact voice.[61] This phrase may not be a verbatim statement but the idea or theme that was spoken is precise. The ipsissima vox is more precise than the modern “paraphrase” and, in fact, there is no English counterpart to this Latin phrase. Therefore, any difference in wording does not undermine the essential theme or message, because two people might naturally convey the same idea differently.[62]

 

Ancient writers had no difficulty in considering these two kinds of verbal expressions as identical. The gospel writers were not necessarily interested in recording the exact words of Christ, but they always recorded His exact voice.[63]  This view or understanding of the gospel writers is consistent with the Greek historian Thucydides, who made the following comments about repeating the exact substance of speeches:

 

It was difficult for me to remember the exact substance of the speeches I myself heard and for others to remember those they heard elsewhere and told me of … I have given the speeches in the manner in which it seemed to me that each of the speakers would best express what was needed to be said about the ever-prevailing situation, but I have kept as close as possible to the total opinion expressed by the actual words.

Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, 1.22.1[64]

 

It is evident from ancient Greek writers that it was permissible to record the primary theme or exact voice (vox) faithfully, rather than obtain an exact quotation or exact words (verba). Scholars agree that the accuracy of the gospel message does not demand verbal precision.[65]  An example of Jewish writers conveying ideas without exact wording was discovered in a Dead Sea Scroll fragment 4Q521, which is explained in this author’s commentary on Luke 7:18-23.[66]  Finally, righteous Jews of the time, who apparently were lower level Pharisees, had a prayer similar to what Jesus had suggested as a model prayer. Note the similarity:

 

May your will be done in heaven above,

and grant peace and contentment to those who fear You,

     and do whatever seems best to You.

 

Mishnah, Berakoth 3:7

 

May it be Your will, O Lord my God,

to make me familiar with your Law,

and cause me to adhere to your commandments.

 

Do not lead me into sin,

nor into iniquity,

nor into temptation,

nor into dishonor.

 

Compel my impulses to serve You,

and keep me far from an evil man or evil temptations.

Give me good desires and good companions in this life.

 

And let me this day and every day find grace,

            favor and mercy in Your eyes

and in all the eyes who see me,

and grant me Your best blessings.

Blessed are You, O Lord, who grants Your best blessings to Your people, Israel.

 

Babylonian Talmud, Berakoth 60b

 

Another example of the exact voice (vox) and the exact words (verba) is the Roman titulus,[67] the sign on the cross that identified Jesus, where each of the four gospel writers wrote the same theme but used different wording.

 

Video Insert    >

08.03.04.V The Significance of Ipsissima Verba and Ipsissima Vox. Dr. Joe Wehrer discusses the significance of “ipsissima verba” and “ipsissima vox” to biblical interpretation.

 

Finally, the important significance of this comparison is that Jesus was not teaching a radical new theology.  The Jews had already heard the essence of His teachings.  He was simply bringing to them the “fullness,” as promised in their Hebrew Bible and applied to His message of the Kingdom of God and salvation.

 

< ——————————————– >

[1]. It is interesting that dancing is the only kind of expression of praise and prayer that is not in the New Testament. In the Hebrew Bible there are eleven Hebrew verb roots related to dancing.  For example, the verb hul, means to whirl, to dance, or to writhe, is found in Psalm 87:7. The fact, that there are so many expressions has led some scholars to conclude that the Israelites may have developed an advanced stage of choreography. Pilch, The Cultural Dictionary of the Bible. 124-25.

 

[2]. For a collection of Jewish traditions connected with the Lord’s Prayer, see Georg Strecker, The Sermon on the Mount: An Exegetical Commentary. Trans O.C. Dean, Jr. (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1988) 108-09.

 

[3]. The Eighteen Benedictions were prayers that were prayed three times every day.  See Appendix 18 “Eighteen Benedictions.”  See also Byargeon, “Echoes of Wisdom in the Lord’s Prayer (Matt 6:9-13).” 353-66.

 

[4]. See 02.02.08 for additional information on the Didache.

[5]. Didache, 8.3.

[6]. De Vries, “Hour.” 2:657.

[7]. See discussion on “Evening” in Appendix 16.

 

[8]. Garr, Restoring Our Lost Legacy. 137-38.

[9]. See discussion on “evening” in Appendix 16; Vine, “Even, Evening, Eventide.” Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary. 2:108.

 

[10]. Jeremias, The Prayers of Jesus. 72-73.

 

[11]. Herbert, “Hypocrite.” 109-10.

 

[12]. See the discussion on hypocrites / hypocrisy in 08.03.04 (Mt. :5-15) and in “Pharisees” in 02.01.14.

[13]. Hindrances to answered prayers are lack of honesty and sincerity (above), unconfessed sin (Ps. 66:18); carnal motives (Jas. 4:3); unbelief (Jas. 1:5-6); satanic activities (Dan. 10:10-13); domestic problems (1 Pet. 3:7); pride (Lk. 18:10-14); robbing God – failure to pay tithes (Mal. 3:8-10); disobedience (Prov. 1:24-28; 28:9; Zech. 7:11-14).

 

[14]. The location of the theater in Jerusalem has not been found as of this writing, but several seat tokens have been uncovered by archaeologists.

 

[15]. Adapted from Barclay, A New Testament Wordbook. 56-59.

[16]. Gal. 2:13; 1 Tim. 4:2; 1 Pet. 2:1.

[17]. Barclay, A New Testament Wordbook. 56-57.

[18]. Mt. 18:19-20; Acts 1:24; 3:1; 4:24-30.  

[19]. Lang, Know the Words of Jesus. 86-87.

[20]. Bock, Jesus According to Scripture. 140.

[21]. Lang, Know the Words of Jesus. 87.

 

[22]. Smith, Augsburg Commentary on the New Testament: Matthew. 110.   

 

[23].  Strong’s No. 5; While the term abba has often been defined as a child’s expression of daddy, language scholar James Barr has suggested that abba was a solemn adult address to father; See Pilch, The Cultural Dictionary of the Bible. 2; Mould, Essentials of Bible History. 530; Vine, “Abba.”Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary. 2:1.

 

[24]. Lang, Know the Words of Jesus. 362-63.

 

[25]. Jeremias, The Prayers of Jesus. 16; For an extensive study on the word Abba, see Joachim Jeremias, The Prayers of Jesus 11-65; Parry, The Complete Idiot’s Guide to the Talmud. 38-39.

 

[26]. Freeman, The New Manners and Customs of the Bible. 414.

 

[27]. Young, The Jewish Background. 11.

[28]. Vine, “Hallow.” Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary. 2:300 and “Hades” 2:287.

[29]. Freeman, The New Manners and Customs of the Bible. 414, quoting the Babylonian Talmud, Berakoth.

[30]. Freeman, The New Manners and Customs of the Bible. 413-14.

 

[31]. Cranefield, “Bread.” 37.

 

[32]. Barclay, A New Testament Wordbook. 53-55.

[33]. See 02.03.03 “Economy” for a brief description of the condition of the economy during the ministry years of Jesus.

 

[34]. Opheiletes – “One who owes anything to another.” Vine, “Debtor.” Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary. 2:150.

 

[35]. Barclay, “Matthew.” 1:192; See also Appendix 18, “The Eighteen Benedictions.”

 

[36]. Freeman, The New Manners and Customs of the Bible. 415.

 

[37]. The book is known by several variations of the name ben Sirach, such as as Ecclesiasticus, Jesus ben Sirach, or Sirach.

[38]. Bailey, Jesus through Middle Eastern Eyes. 252.

[39]. Taylor, “Debt, Debtor.” 61-62.

 

[40]. Young, The Jewish Background. 30.

[41]. See 03.04.17.

 

[42]. Cited by Freeman, The New Manners and Customs of the Bible. 415; Ben Sirach and Tobit belong to a classification of extra-biblical books known as the Apocrypha. These two literary works reflect the opinions of many Jewish people. See 02.02.03 “Apocrypha” for more information. The reader is reminded that quotations from non-biblical sources are not to be understood as being of equal authority with the biblical narratives. See 01.02.04.

 

[43]. The framework of a prayer in Jubilees 12:19-20, written in the second century B.C., is strikingly similar to the Lord’s Prayer.

 

[44]. Thomas, The Golden Treasury of Patristic Quotations: From 50 – 750 A.D. 106.

[45]. Carson, “Matthew” 8:172-73; Young, The Jewish Background. 31-32; See also Mishnah, Avot 5:3.

[46]. Bailey, Jesus through Middle Eastern Eyes. 131.

 

[47]. Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament. 1:43-44.

 

[48]. Barclay, “Matthew.” 1:224.

 

[49]. Freeman, The New Manners and Customs of the Bible. 415.

 

[50]. Young, The Jewish Background. 24.

[51]. For additional references on the doctrine of sanctification, see Heb. 12:14; 1 Pet. 1:14-16; 1 Thess. 5:23-24; 1 Jn. 2:6; Rom. 8:3.

[52]. Martin, Worship in the Early Church. 35.

[53]. Ajamian, “People, Land, and Faith – An Armenian-Orthodox Perspective.” 74.

 

[54]. Young, The Jewish Background. 4.

[55]. Mt. 3:2; 4:17; 12:34; Lk. 17:21. For further study, see John F. Walvoord. Matthew: Thy Kingdom Come. Chicago: Moody, 1974.

 

[56]. Mt. 25:1; Jn. 18:36; Acts 1:6-7

 

[57]. See Mt. 11:12; 12:28; 16:19; Lk. 11:20; 16:16; 17:21 as well as the parables of the Sower, the Tares, the Levean, and the Dragnet.

 

[58]. See Dan. 7:27; Mt. 13:43; 19:28; 25:34; 26:29; Mk. 9:47; 2 Pet. 1:11; 1 Cor. 9:9; Rev. 20. See also Richardson, “Kingdom of God.” 119-21.  Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament. 1:310-11.

 

[59]. Jeremias, The Prayers of Jesus. Appendix; Hatch, The Influence of Greek Ideas and Usages. vii.

 

[60]. Charlesworth, Jesus within Judaism. 166; Hatch, The Influence of Greek Ideas and Usages. vii.

 

[61]. Charlesworth, Jesus within Judaism. 166; Hatch, The Influence of Greek Ideas and Usages. vii.

 

[62]. Hagner, “Jesus and the Synoptic Sabbath Controversies.” 270. A classic example are the descriptions of Jesus that were written on the titulus, which was then carried before Him as He was led to the crucifixion site. These descriptions are discussed later in this eBook.

 

[63]. Barclay, Jesus. 243; Hagner, “Jesus and the Synoptic Sabbath Controversies.” 268.

 

[64]. Cited in Bock and Herrick, Jesus in Context. 73-99. See expanded comments by Thucydides in sections 1.21-22.

 

[65]. These scholars hold to the Reformed Doctrine of Biblical Inspiration on the concept of Ipsissima Vox: Stonehouse, Origins of the Synoptic Gospels. 109-10; Murray, Calvin on Scripture and Devine Sovereignty. 30; Hodge and Warfield, “Inspiration.” 238.

[66]. See 08.05.04.

 

[67]. See “An Illustration of a Roman Titulus” at 16.01.11.A. The titulus was a wooden placard carried by the condemned or by the lead soldier, on which was written the reason for the execution.

 



08.03.05 THE PRINCIPLE OF FASTING

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 07, 2016  -  Comments Off on 08.03.05 THE PRINCIPLE OF FASTING

08.03.05 Mt. 6:16-18

 

THE PRINCIPLE OF FASTING

 

16Whenever you fast, don’t be sad-faced like the hypocrites. For they make their faces unattractive so their fasting is obvious to people. I assure you: They’ve got their reward! 17 But when you fast, put oil on your head, and wash your face, 18 so that you don’t show your fasting to people but to your Father who is in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you.

 

Fasting originated as a single day event – the Day of Atonement – as written by Moses.  These are a few of his words:

 

29 “This is to be a permanent statute for you: In the seventh month, on the tenth day of the month you are to practice self-denial and do no work, both the native and the foreigner who resides among you. 30 Atonement will be made for you on this day to cleanse you, and you will be clean from all your sins before the Lord. 31 It is a Sabbath of complete rest for you, and you must practice self-denial; it is a permanent statute.

 

Leviticus 16:29-31

 

Prior to the exile in Babylon, the Jews were required to fast only on the Day of Atonement (Lev. 16:29-31; 23:27-32; Num. 29:7). However, during the exilic period, regular fasts were introduced (Zech. 7:3-5; 8:19).  In both the Hebrew Bible and New Testament, fasting is associated with a specific purpose, such as the confession of sin[1] although fasting was prescribed in the Torah for only one day in the year, the Day of Atonement.[2]

 

“Whenever you fast.”  Many Jews believed that fasting was a form of self-punishment that would ward off divine punishment.[3] They did not realize or acknowledge that biblical fasting is the denial of food for a period of time during which the believer is in pursuit of a deeper relationship with God.[4]  This pursuit was to be in the privacy of one’s home or a secluded area.

 

Centuries earlier, during the days of Isaiah, God rebuked the Israelites, because they fasted without a changed life (Isa. 38:1-7; cf. Mt. 6:16-18). Somehow, the religious leaders missed the lesson and had a distorted view of it.  In this passage, Jesus applied the imagery of the theater to the actions of the Pharisees who were anything but private with their fasting.  The Pharisees did not literally paint their faces when fasting, but they gave the appearance they were suffering and in severe discomfort. As they walked throughout the city in bare feet, un-bathed, and with ashes sprinkled on their heads; their procession was similar to actors of the Greek theater who painted and disfigured their faces to portray the characters they played. The Pharisees prided themselves on fasting twice a week (Lk. 18:12) – on Mondays and Thursdays, when the markets were open and everyone could see them.[5] Jesus opposed this and desired prayer and worship to be in spirit and truth and, therefore, in secret rather than in any form of public display.

 

“Put oil on your head, and wash your face.”  Jesus said the tradition of ashes, appearance of sorrow and discomfort should be set aside and a mood of joy should accompany the one fasting.  The placement of oil on the head and the face washing were social indicators of joyful events.[6]  Finally, ever since Moses wrote his passage in Leviticus, fasting had been instituted for several reasons as follows.[7]

 

  1. Fasting was connected with mourning when a loved on passed on.[8]

 

  1. The Jewish people fasted after everyone suffered from the results of a civil war (Jg. 20:26). Likewise, it was an expression of sorrow concerning personal or national loss (cf. the destruction of Jerusalem in 2 Kg. 25:8; Jer. 52:12).
  2. The prophet Samuel required a fast of repentance because the people strayed from their God and worshipped Baal (1 Sam. 7:6).

 

  1. Moses referred to fasting as an expression of remorse and penitence over sin (Lev. 16). Nehemiah called for a fast of confession of sin, repentance, and asking for forgiveness (Neh. 9:1).
  2. Fasting draws the attention of God to the one who is afflicting himself.
  3. Fasting is proof that repentance is real, but the potential problem is that fasting can become a substitute for repentance. Ultimately, the proof of repentance is a changed attitude and lifestyle.

 

  1. Fasting can be vicarious, meaning that it is not for the benefit of the one petitioning God, but for the benefit of another person, church, or nation.

 

  1. Fasting increases spiritual awareness which results in one’s ability to hear from God. Amazingly, members of the Sanhedrin were to pray and fast for the court decisions they were about to render. The purpose of prayer and fasting has always been to passionately ask for God’s guidance and blessing with thanksgiving.

 

  1. Fasting can be a means of strengthening prayer.[9] It was a way to prepare for entering the presence of Almighty God (Ex. 34:28; Dan. 9:3; 10:2-3). Prayer and fasting not only brings one closer to God, but should also reinforce a sense of holiness as evidenced by a changed life.

The fast is a physical expression of a heart-felt sorrow. A true fast must be done with an honest and pure heart.  Note the words of an Inter-Testamental writer.

 

The man who fasts to get rid of his sins, and goes again and does the same thing – who will listen to his prayer, and what profit is there in his humbling himself?

 

Ben Sirach 31:30

[1]. Neh. 9:1-2; Ps. 35:13; Isa. 58:3, 5; Dan. 9:2-20; 10:2-3; Jon. 3:5; Acts 9:9.

[2]. Lev. 16:29; 23:27; Num. 29:7.

 

[3]. Lang, Know the Words of Jesus. 176.

 

[4]. Ex. 34:28; 1 Sam. 7:6; 1 Kg. 19:8.

 

[5]. Earle, “Luke” 2:79; Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament. 1:405;  Mishnah, Taanith 1:4-7; See also Didache 8:1.

 

[6]. New International Version Study Bible footnote on Mt. 6:17.

[7]. As is shown elsewhere in this study, the leading Pharisees fasted on Mondays and Thursdays which were the market days in Jerusalem.  This permitted everyone to see that they were fasting, which was little more than a public display of self-righteousness that Jesus condemned.

 

[8]. Examples are found in these extra-biblical books: Reuben in The Testament of Reuben 1:10; Simeon in The Testimony of Simeon 3:4; and Judah in The Testament of Judah 15:4. These are found in a larger literary work known as The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs. See Appendix 22 for further information.

 

[9]. Jer. 14:12; Neh. 1:4; Acts 13:3; 14:23.

 



08.04 Concerns Of Life

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 07, 2016  -  Comments Off on 08.04 Concerns Of Life

Unit 08

Topical Issues

 

Chapter 04

Concerns Of This Life

 

08.04.00.A. JESUS SPEAKS NEAR THE TREASURY by James Tossit.08.04.00.A. JESUS SPEAKS NEAR THE TREASURY by James Tossit. Jesus spoke on the spiritual treasures of the Kingdom of God while near the temple treasury where many kept their personal funds.



08.04.01 SPIRITUAL TREASURES

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 07, 2016  -  Comments Off on 08.04.01 SPIRITUAL TREASURES

08.04.01 Mt. 6:19-24

 

SPIRITUAL TREASURES

 

19 Don’t collect for yourselves treasures on earth,

where moth and rust destroy,

and where thieves break in and steal. 

 

20 But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven,

where neither moth and rust destroys,  

and where thieves don’t break in and steal. 

 

21 For where your treasure is,

there your heart will be also.

 

22 “The eye is the lamp of the body.

If your eye is good,

your whole body will be full of light. 

23 But if your eye is bad,

                  your whole body will be full of darkness. 

 

So if the light within you is darkness—

         how deep is that darkness?

 

If then the light within you

is darkness,

how great is that darkness!

 

24 “No one can be a slave of two masters.

Since either he will hate the one

and love the other,

or be devoted to one

and despise the other. 

You cannot be slaves of God and of money.                                 

           

At this time there was no institutionalized banking system, although there is clear evidence that the aristocrats and super rich stored their wealth in the temple.[1] But for most people, what little they had was hidden somewhere in their home or possibly buried in a field. Since houses were generally constructed of stone, and sometimes of brick depending upon location, thieves could literally dig their way into a house.

 

“Moth and rust destroy.” The Greek term for rust is brosis (1111) and it literally means to eat away. Therefore, the word “moth” and “rust” are parallelisms to emphasize the futility of earthly wealth.  Preventing loss was a major concern because these objects of value were easily stolen or subject to deterioration.[2] Preserving wealth often became an obsession, which is why the Apostle Paul warned about getting engrossed with it (1 Cor. 7:31; 1 Tim. 6:9). In fact, all of the disciples had divorced themselves from material passions, something that was most certainly difficult in a peasant-slave culture under Roman oppression (Philip. 4:11-14).

 

“Eye is good … eye is bad.”  This idiom of the eyes was popular in all ancient Middle Eastern cultures and a modified version continues on today.  The phrase, good eye, from the Hebrew aiyin tovah [3] or Greek haplous, meant one was sound, kind, giving and generous,[4]  but today it has the meaning of good luck or good fortune. On the other hand, the phrase bad eye, (Heb. aiyin ra’ah) meant that one was jealous and greedy; [5]  although the phrase has been changed to mean evil eye.[6]

 

“So if the light within you is darkness—how deep is that darkness?” How can light (Gk. phos) be darkness (Gk. skotos)?[7] This statement is one of several oxymorons[8] used in Scripture. It is intended to combine words that are naturally opposite, but, when used in this manner, they enhance the meaning of the speaker.  In this case, if a small amount of light is considered to be darkness, how much more darkness would there be if there was absolutely no light whatsoever?

 

“You cannot be slaves of God and of money.”  The word money in a general Aramaic or Hebrew sense means wealth.  And the passion to obtain wealth often commanded and possessed a man’s allegiance and, thus, became his god.  When he finally has financial security, he seldom needs divine security, and has no need to trust God for his daily provisions. Therefore, he cannot serve both God and his financial security. Jesus was often quick to condemn those who had great wealth, not because they were wealthy, but because He knew that their wealth was their security – a substitute for God Himself.  The proper use of wealth is to help expand the Kingdom of God. Finally, Jesus was not alone in this comment as some Old Testament prophets[9] made similar statements as did some rabbis in later Judaism[10] and in the Dead Sea Scrolls.[11]

[1]. 4 Maccabees 4.3; Josephus, Wars 6.5.2 (282); See also banking discussion in 05.05.04.

[2]. Carson, “Matthew” 8:177.

[3]. Moseley, Yeshua: A Guide to the Real Jesus and the Original Church. 29.

 

[4]. Lang, Know the Words of Jesus. 224; Bock, Jesus According to Scripture. 142-43.

 

[5]. Bock, Jesus According to Scripture. 221.

 

[6]. Moseley, Yeshua: A Guide to the Real Jesus and the Original Church. 28-29; See Lk. 11:34; 09.02.01; 12.03.10.

 

[7]. Barclay, Jesus. 264.

 

[8]. Bullinger, Figures of Speech Used in the Bible. 816-18; See Appendix 26 for definition.

[9]. Amos 5:10-12; Isa. 1:22-23; 5:8-10.

 

[10]. 1 Enoch 92-105.

 

[11]. Safrai and Flusser. “The Slave of Two Masters.” 32; 1 QS 3:19-22.

 



08.04.02 AVOIDING ANXIETY

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 07, 2016  -  Comments Off on 08.04.02 AVOIDING ANXIETY

08.04.02 Mt. 6:25-34

 

AVOIDING ANXIETY 

 

25 “This is why I tell you: Don’t worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink; or about your body, what you will wear. Isn’t life more than food and the body more than clothing? 26 Look at the birds of the sky: They don’t sow or reap or gather into barns, yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Aren’t you worth more than they? 27 Can any of you add a single cubit to his height by worrying?

 

28 And why do you worry about clothes? Learn how the wildflowers of the field grow: they don’t labor or spin thread. 29 Yet I tell you that not even Solomon in all his splendor was adorned like one of these! 30 If that’s how God clothes the grass of the field, which is here today and thrown into the furnace tomorrow, won’t He do much more for you — you of little faith? 31 So don’t worry, saying, ‘What will we eat?’ or ‘What will we drink?’ or ‘What will we wear?’

32 For the idolaters eagerly seek all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them. 33 But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things will be provided for you. 34 Therefore don’t worry about tomorrow, because tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.

 

There are certain key words and phrases that stand out in the gospels. One of them is “pray,” because Jesus often went somewhere to be alone to pray.  Another is the term “don’t worry.” This term not only suggests His strength and poise that is to be within the believer, but is also an encouragement of faith. Over and over again Jesus told His disciples not to worry as there is only one supreme concern and that is the issues of the Spirit. It is a step of spiritual maturity when one can stop worrying and face challenges in faith. That does not negate honest concern about an issue, but the crippling effect of worry reflects lack of faith in God. The next step in maturity is to seek first the Kingdom of God (Mt. 6:33), that is, to pray about and accomplish the tasks assigned in building the Kingdom of God.

“Don’t worry about your life.”  These words must have sounded like some kind of humor because was explosive tension between the Romans and Jews. In the midst of Roman occupation, high taxation, and economic stress, Jesus commented on the essential elements of life, which God continues to provide for His own.  The Jews, and especially Jesus, were constantly under the watchful eye of the Romans, as well as the Herodian spies.  In this explosive social setting, Jesus essentially said, “Do not worry about your life, God will take care of you.”  The concept is simply an extension of His words on the fulfillment of the Law (Mt. 5:1-48; cf. 6:19, 24), where phrases such as “lay up treasures in heaven” and “serve God,” are in close context with this teaching.

 

On the other hand, this statement does not negate the curse of being lazy, apathetic, or indifferent.  It means that believers ought to focus their faith in and devotion to God, while working toward the necessities of life and family.  Neither does it mean that one should not plan for the future.  Noah planned to build a boat, but did not worry about it even when under tremendous social pressure and ridicule.  The Apostle Paul planned mission trips, but did not worry about his travels.  Likewise, we are to make godly plans, but are not to worry about them.  Being overly concerned for one’s welfare was not unique to the time of Jesus. One of the early church fathers made this comment about the attention given to the physical bodies at the expense of godly matters:

 

There are many people who exert greater care for their bodies than they do for their soul. But they should devote a greater solicitude for their souls, where the image of God is.  When the flesh, which they love so much, begins to be devoured by worms in the grave, the soul is presented to God by the angels in heaven.

 

Caesar of Arles, Sermons[1]

 

“Look at the birds of the sky.”  Here the Master Teacher connected His teaching with the bountiful beauty of nature.  The Holy Land lies between the Mediterranean Sea on the west and what was then known as the northern part of the Arabian Desert (today’s Jordan) on the east. It is the land bridge that connects the continents of Africa, Europe and Asia.  This small parcel of fertile land is in the flight path of one-third of all migratory birds, an estimated five hundred million that fly over it every March and again every November as they migrate from one continent to another.[2]  This phrase was an excellent illustration of the love and care of God.

 

“Cubit.” A cubit is a distance measurement, but here Jesus used it as a figure of speech concerning time.

 

“The wildflowers of the field.”  Only Switzerland has more natural wildflowers than Israel. Israel’s beauty is phenomenal by the time the winter rains end, but by late April and early May the hot, dry sirocco winds from the eastern desert dry them up quickly.[3] The withered plants were harvested and used for fuel in home cooking and pottery kilns (cf. Ps. 103 and Isa. 40).

 

08.04.02.A. WILD FLOWERS OF ISRAEL

08.04.02.A. WILD FLOWERS OF ISRAEL.  Israel has more wild flowers than any other nation except Switzerland.  About the time the winter rains end and temperatures rise (March and April) the plains and mountain regions are a carpet of wild flowers.  Photograph by the author.

 

 

08.04.02.B. A TYPICAL CLAY OVEN

08.04.02.B. A TYPICAL CLAY OVEN.   A clay oven, known as a tabun, such as this one is barely 24 inches high. It was used daily for basic “baking” pizza-shaped bread, which was laid upon its outer surface to bake.  Fuel was anything that would burn, although dried grass and manure was the most common fuel. Notice the hanging frying pan, a rare item in the first century. Photograph by the author.

 

“Solomon in all his splendor.”  The extreme wealth and power of King Solomon was proverbial.[4] People spoke of him as they did of his legendary father King David and the great international empire he established. The conclusion of this passage is that one’s life is to be focused on God in all daily activities (Mt. 6:33). These words were probably applauded by the Essenes who devoted themselves to every commandment of the Law of Moses,[5] but Jesus emphasized this with kindness and love.

[1]. Thomas, The Golden Treasury of Patristic Quotations: From 50 – 750 A.D. 262; Note:  the term “Caesar” was a family name, but it became the title of the emperor who had the same family name.  This Caesar was not affiliated with the Roman monarchy.

[2]. Horovitz, “Starling Express.” 5.

[3]. Levy, The Ruin and Restoration of Israel. 89.

 

[4]. 1 Kg. 3:12-13; 4:21-34; 2 Ch. 9:13-28.

 

[5]. Dead Sea Scroll 1QS 1:1-2; 5:8-11.   

 



08.04.03 HYPOCRITICAL JUDGING

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 07, 2016  -  Comments Off on 08.04.03 HYPOCRITICAL JUDGING

08.04.03 Lk. 6:37-42 (See also Mt. 7:1-5)

 

HYPOCRITICAL JUDGING

 

37 Do not judge,

and you will not be judged.   

Do not condemn,

and you will not be condemned. 

Forgive,

and you will be forgiven. 

38 Give,  

and it will be given to you; 

            A good measure –  

            pressed down,

            shaken together

            and running over –  

will be poured into your lap

 

For with the measure you use,

it will be measured back to you.

 

39 He also told them a parable: “Can the blind guide the blind? Won’t they both fall into a pit? 40 A disciple is not above his teacher, but everyone who is fully trained will be like his teacher.

 

41 “Why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but don’t notice the log in your own eye? 42 Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me take out the speck that is in your eye,’ when you yourself don’t see the log in your eye? Hypocrite! First take the log out of your eye, and then you will see clearly to take out the speck in your brother’s eye.

 

 

08.04.03.Q1 Are we to judge or not to judge others (Mt. 7:1 vs. 1 Cor. 5:12, etc)?

 

Matthew 7:1 and Luke 6:37 clearly say “do not judge,” but other passages such as 1 Corinthians 5:12) indicate otherwise.  By definition, the phrase judge (Gk. katadikazete) as found in Matthew and Luke refer to sharp unjust criticism[1] but could also be rendered as condemn not.[2] Since all of humanity is a fallen race, no one has the right to condemn another or to be a “faultfinder.”  In fact, God will either judge us or have mercy on us, depending on how we either judge or have mercy on others. The Hebraic poetry in this passage sets the parameters of the meaning of the word.  The meaning is restricted to this use and does not have reference to discernment or general decisions that need to be made in human affairs.[3]  Jesus did not forbid the discernment between truth and error in doctrine or in the life of another, but He meant that one should not judge others self-righteously or condemningly (cf Mt. 23:13-39; Rom. 2:1).  In addition, Scripture as a whole directs believers to carefully discern false or real prophets, as well as the fruitfulness of others.  Based on careful judgment (meaning discernment), there are several situations were judgment is commanded:

 

  1. Concerning those who are sexually immoral (1 Cor. 5:9),

 

  1. Concerning those who masquerade as purveyors of truth (2 Cor. 11:14),[4]

 

  1. Concerning those who preach a false gospel (Philip. 3:2), and

 

  1. Concerning those who are false prophets (1 Jn. 4:1)

 

Persons who reflect one or more of these and other characteristics or behaviors are to be avoided and, in some cases, they are to be excommunicated from the local church. This type of judgment or discernment was not what Jesus taught in this passage. He was specifically speaking of unjust criticism.  Scriptures provides these considerations:

 

  1. God will judge us by how we judge others (with mercy?) (Mt. 7:2)

 

  1. Do not judge by appearance (Jn. 7:24)

 

  1. Mercy triumphs over judgment (Jas. 2:13)

 

  1. God alone is the ultimate judge

Yet care must be taken because one does not always understand all the events that occurred in another’s life.  That is why the famous Rabbi Hillel once said,

 

Do not judge your brother until you have come to his place.

 

            Mishnah, Aboth 2.4

 

Furthermore, there are two important phrases that are to be considered: “Give and it will be given to you.”  This passage is frequently used in terms of tithing to the church.  However, note that the context is a discussion on forgiveness, not tithing.  Jesus said if we forgive much, He will forgive us abundantly.  This same principle of giving forgiveness can be applied to other areas of life such as giving tithes, offerings, and alms.  The second phrase suggests that divine forgiveness “will be poured into your lap.”  Men’s clothing at the time were loose like women’s dresses are today. Since a belt was worn around the waist, the garment could be folded to create a large front pocket that could be used to carry a huge amount of goods, such as grain. The blessing of God that would be “running over,” is potentially far more than what could have been placed on one’s lap or pocket.

 

Concerning proper judgments, Jesus made an exaggeration when He said, “First, take the log out of your eye.”  The phrase is a hyperbole, a ridiculous contrast, a statement of over-emphasis involving a word play of “speck” and “log/plank”[5] to dramatize a point. In essence, Jesus said that we should take a tree or large piece of timber out of our own eye before taking a toothpick or splinter out of the eye of another, meaning that before attempting to help someone else, one had to clean up his own life.  No one has the right to judge another’s conduct or motive until his own life has been cleaned up, then righteous men and women are to use discernment in their judgments of others.  Therefore, there are times when judgments according to divine principles are in order.

[1]. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament. 60.

 

[2]. Lang, Know the Words of Jesus. 159.

 

[3]. Liefeld, “Luke.” 8:895.

[4]. See the discussion on hypocrites/hypocrisy in 08.03.04 (Mt. :5-15) and in “Pharisees” in 02.01.14.

[5]. Liefeld, “Luke.” 8:895.



08.04.04 INAPPROPRIATE CONCERN

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 07, 2016  -  Comments Off on 08.04.04 INAPPROPRIATE CONCERN

08.04.04 Mt. 7:6

 

INAPPROPRIATE CONCERN 

 

6 Don’t give what is holy to dogs

Or toss your pearls before pigs, 

Or they will trample them with their feet,

turn, and tear you to pieces.

 

“Don’t give what is holy to dogs.” The word dog was a degrading term used by Jews when speaking of a non-Jewish person.[1]  Today the phrase, “going to the dogs” meaning, “to ruin” comes from this phrase. But more degrading than the word “dog,” was an association with pigs.  The Jews considered pigs the most unclean animal and on their list of forbidden foods.[2]  What is sacred is, of course, of great value and in this parable is compared to the high value of pearls.  The poetic parallel form is obvious. The analogy is that the good things of God should not be taken lightly.

 

The problem with this verse is that it appears to demand a level of exclusiveness even though Jesus is the Savior for everyone.  The early church interpreted it in two ways.

 

  1. Some said that this passage was written for the Jews, since the term dogs was believed to refer to Gentiles. Therefore, if a Gentile desired to become a believer, first he had to become a Jew, accept the Law, and be circumcised. Only then could he be accepted as a believer. This issue of Gentiles first becoming Jews before becoming Christians eventually became the subject of debate at the first church counsel in Jerusalem.

 

  1. Others believed that since the followers of Jesus were under constant threat of persecution, the term dogs was applied to anyone who betrayed fellow Jews or persecuted them.

 

In the decades following the ascension of Jesus, there was severe persecution of Christians. Because of this and the loss of key leaders to martyrdom, pastors were forced to

 

  1. Examine new converts carefully to insure that they were genuine converts and

 

  1. Made sure all who professed to be believers still held to the orthodox doctrines of faith.[3]

 

Matthew 7:6 quickly became a significant guidepost for admitting some and prohibiting others from attending the Lord’s Table, that is, the Eucharist. As church growth exploded, many false teachers entered various congregations and caused chaos and confusion.  Tertullian complained that popular false teachers and heretics permitted everyone to our Lord’s Table, similar to “Open Communion” practiced by many churches today. He said,

 

That which is holy they will cast to the dogs, and pearls to swine.

 

Tertullian, De Praescriptione 41

 

The early church not only underscored the exclusiveness of our Lord’s Table, but also made a reference to Matthew 7:6 as follows.

 

Let no one eat and drink from your Eucharist but those baptized in the name of the Lord: to this, too, the saying of the Lord is applicable, “Do not give to dogs what is sacred.”

 

Didache 9:5

 

The gospel message was available to everyone.  However, to become a part of the inner circle of believers and partake of the Communion Table, one had to show evidence of a changed and consecrated life.  It has been said that the challenges that the first century faced immediately after the ascension will be the same immediately before He returns. If so, then church leaders today may need to re-evaluate their open communion policies.

[1]. Ex. 22:31; 1 Kings 21:23; Ps. 22:16, 20; 59:14; 68:23; Jer. 15:3; Mt. 15:26-27; Mk. 7:27-28; Lk. 16:21; Phil. 3:2; Rev. 22:15.

[2]. Lev. 11:7; Isa. 65:4; 66:3, 17; Lk. 15:15-16.

[3]. This practice by pastors continues today in many areas of the world where believers are persecuted and martyred.



08.04.05 PERSISTENCE OF PRAYER

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 07, 2016  -  Comments Off on 08.04.05 PERSISTENCE OF PRAYER

08.04.05 Mt. 7:7-12

 

PERSISTENCE OF PRAYER

 

7 “Keep asking

and it will be given to you;

keep searching

and you will find;

keep knocking,

and the door will be opened to you

8 For everyone who asks  

receives,

and the one who searches

finds,

and to the one who knocks,

the door will be opened.

 

9 What man among you, if his son asks him for bread,

will give him a stone? 

10 Or if he asks for a fish,

he give him a snake?

 

11 If you then, who are evil,

know how to give good gifts to your children,

how much more will your Father in heaven

give good gifts to those who ask him! 

 

12 Therefore, whatever you want others to do for you, do also the same for them this is the Law and the Prophets.

 

If his son asks him for bread, will give him a stone? 10 Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake?” The point of the message is that a father would never give his son a stone or snake when he needs food.  Likewise the Father in heaven would never give His children anything that would hurt them, but desires to give only the best.

In ancient times, bread was not baked in oblong pans that formed thick loaves, as is done today in the West.  Some have mistakenly said loaves were in the same shape as stones and, therefore, Jesus made a visual connection.  Yet this author has traveled all over Israel and never found an example of this proposed similarity.  Residents of Israel agree that stones simply do not look like the thin pancake-shaped loaves of bread.

 

08.04.05.A. TRADITIONAL BREAD

08.04.05.A. TRADITIONAL BREAD. Many bake shops in Jerusalem and other communities today bake bread as was done in biblical times.  The bread is similar to a pancake and is laid on the flat surface of the oven, hot rock, or today, on the outer edge of a 55-gallon steel drum.  Photograph by the author.

 

Once when teaching in Israel, one of the author’s students informed him that rocks were first placed in an open fire to be heated. They were then removed and the flat dough was spread over the stones to bake. The student also showed the author a gas-fired oven lined with rocks.  Thin batches of dough were placed on the pre-heated rocks clearly demonstrating that the old tradition was adapted to the 21st century.

When Jesus was teaching along the shore of the Sea of Galilee, He was near the small fishing village of Tabgha. A short distance into the water are seven hot springs that is favorite habitat area for fish and snakes during the colder winter months.[1]  This figure of speech was used because snakes occasionally were caught in the nets of fishermen. This was mentioned by the visiting Spanish Pilgrim Egeria (c. 383) and by Theodosius (c. 530).[2]

Here, and again in Matthew 22:39, Jesus made an appeal to believers to ask their heavenly Father for what they need, and He will provide.  Likewise, we are to treat others in the same manner as we desire to be treated ourselves.  It rephrases what Moses said fifteen centuries earlier.

 

Do not take revenge or bear a grudge against members of your community, but love your neighbor as yourself; I am Yahweh.

Leviticus 19:18

 

Divine instructions for life have been in existence since Adam and Eve. That is why Abraham gave a tithe long before Moses wrote of the commandment concerning tithes. That is also why some basic principles of life in Judaism and Christianity (i.e. marriage = 1 man +1 woman) are found in other religions. The Golden Rule (Matthew 7:12) is found in negative form in Hinduism, Buddhism, and Confucianism, as well as in the rabbinic writings.  Variations have also been found in Greek and Roman ethical teachings. This suggests two things:

 

  1. Even those who never heard of the Word of God have by consciousness, an awareness of right and wrong as defined by God.

 

  1. The moral, social, and ethical codes of conduct from Noah’s post-flood day continued to be honored until the time of Christ.

 

Almost two centuries before Christ, a Jewish scribe by the name of Jesus, son of Sirach, wrote a text known as Ben Sirach, a/k/a Ecclesiasticus.  This extra-biblical book has an interesting reflection on the writings of Moses. The following words indicate that at least some Jews were close to understanding the principles of the Kingdom of God before Jesus came:

 

Forgive your neighbor the wrong he has done,

   and your sins will be pardoned when you pray.

 

Does anyone harbor anger against another,

   And expect healing from the Lord?

 

If one has no mercy toward another like himself,

   Can he then seek pardon for his own sins?

 Ben Sirach 28:2-4

 

Many Jews had already put into practice what Jesus was teaching before He came.  One Jewish scholar, David Flusser of Hebrew University in Jerusalem, went so far as to say that, “From ancient Jewish writings, we could easily construct a whole Gospel without using a single word that originated with Jesus. This could only be done, however, because we do, in fact, possess the Gospels.”[3]

“If you then, who are evil.”  This is a general statement meaning that all men are sinners. The sinful nature of people does not mean they do not love their children and want to care for them.  So how much more does God the Father care for His children?  Jeremiah said that humanity was lost, deceitful, and wicked (Jer. 17:9), but God sent Jesus that people would not be condemned, but would be saved (Jn. 3:16).  This is foundational to understanding the Christian faith.

“Whatever you want others to do for you, do also the same for them.”  Again, the teachings of Jesus were reflected by some leading rabbis who had an accurate perception that the Law was not to legalize or restrict, but to point the way the heart should be guided.  Two rabbis made these comments that are incredibly similar to Matthew 7:12. Rabbi Eliezer said,

 

            Let the honor of your own fellow man be as dear to you as your own.

            Mishnah, Aboth 2:10

 

And Rabbi Yose said,

 

            Let the possessions of your fellow man be as dear to you as your own.

            Mishnah, Aboth 2:12

 

“This is the Law and the Prophets.”  Verse 12 is a summary statement. Jesus again clarified that He did not come to replace the Old Testament, but to fulfill it.  He did not replace the Law per se, but instructed His disciples to fulfill the intent of the Law.  The intent of the Law, as well as understanding the character of God, is explained in the following manner:

 

Obeying the Old Testament Law = shallow understanding

 

Obeying the Old Testament Law with grace = deeper understanding

 

To say that the Old Testament is invalid is correct only in terms of the sacrificial system, as Jesus replaced that system with His body at Calvary.  It is significant that all other portions are to be honored as reflected in obedience. On an important side note, it is unfortunate that the Church has adopted a Roman view of Law, that means restriction and is therefore, bad, but fails to see that the Hebrew Bible views Law as instruction and freedom, and is therefore, good.[4]

An encounter was recorded between Rabbi Hillel and Rabbi Shammai both of whom lived just prior to the birth of Jesus and during His young manhood. The story is that of a pagan who asked both scholars to teach him the core issue of the Torah. Their responses reflect an interesting insight of their character and belief system.

 

A pagan came before Shammai and said to him, “Make me a proselyte, but on the condition that you teach me the entire Torah while I am standing on one foot!”  Shammai drove him off with the builder’s measuring rod which he had in his hand.  When he (the pagan) appeared before Hillel, the latter told him, “What is hateful to you, do not to your neighbor.  That is the whole Torah, while the rest is commentary; go and learn.”

 

            Babylonian Talmud, Shabbath 30b[5]

 

Many of the teachings of Jesus confirmed what righteous Jews already knew. Those who opposed Him did so on the grounds that they held the Oral Law in a position superior to the Hebrew Bible. Likewise, they refused to recognize Him as their Messiah.

08.04.05a

 

[1]. The Jordan River Valley is dotted with locations where hot springs still exist.  The most popular for tourists today are the hot springs resort in Tiberius and the family park of the Hamat Gader Roman Baths at the southeast end of the Sea of Galilee.

[2]. Kane, “Capernaum.” 1:246.

[3]. Flusser, Jesus. 90.

[4]. See video 08.01.06.V by Messianic Rabbi John Fischer who discusses the term “light and heavy” elements of the Mosaic instruction from a first century Jewish perspective. He makes a comment about the definition of “Torah” as it means “guidance” or “instruction,” rather than “law.”

 

[5]. See also Babylonian Talmud, Shabbath 31a; cf. Didache 1:2.

 



08.04.06 NARROW AND WIDE GATES OF LIFE

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 07, 2016  -  Comments Off on 08.04.06 NARROW AND WIDE GATES OF LIFE

08.04.06 Mt. 7:13-14

 

NARROW AND WIDE GATES OF LIFE

 

13 “Enter through the narrow gate. 

 

For the gate is wide and

The road is broad that leads to destruction,

and there are many who go through it. 

 

14 How narrow is the gate and

difficult the road that leads to life,

and few find it.

 

The idea that the first would be last is the direct opposite of Jewish thought.[1] Jesus again speaks to the Jewish people about their prevailing belief that just because they were descendants of Abraham, all would inherit heaven.[2]  This doctrine was promoted by the Pharisees who taught that all Jews would enjoy eternity with God and all Gentiles would be damned to hell – but Jesus clearly disagreed.

The metaphors “the gate” and “the road” are reflective of the decisions of life.  Jesus spoke of the lifestyle that is grounded in His Word and compared it to the popular Hellenistic ideas and philosophies. The Hellenism of the first century was no different than the humanism of today.  There are still two destinies from which one must choose; one leads to life and the other to destruction (Gk. phthora).[3] In essence, decisions determine destiny. The Hebrew Bible has some definite directives on making the right decisions concerning worship and obedience to God.

 

  1. Joshua told his people to decide today whom they will serve (Jos. 24:15).

 

  1. Moses told his people to choose life so their descendants might live (Deut. 30:15-20).

 

  1. Jeremiah told his people that God said that He set before them a way of life and a way of death (Jer. 21:8).

 

Furthermore, Jewish literature, and especially poetry, was abundant in contrasting ideas because it was an integral part of the first century Jewish thought process.  Themes such as “light” and “darkness,” or “wise men” and “foolish men” are found throughout both Testaments, extra-canonical books, and the Dead Sea Scrolls. A few of many examples are,

 

  1. The contrast between the way of life and the way of death is found in Jeremiah 21:8 and the Didache 1:1.

 

  1. The way of the wicked and the way of the righteous is contrasted in Psalm 1:6. Similar contrasts are found in Proverbs 14:2, Mishnah, Aboth 2:9, and in the Testament of Asher 1:3-5.

 

  1. Light and darkness is contrasted in Barnabas 18:1 and Dead Sea Scroll 1QS 3:20-21.

 

These writings demonstrate that from Moses to Jesus, there were always those who were concerned with making godly decisions in life. An example from the second century B.C. era is the words of Jesus ben Sirach who said,

 

“The way of sinners (as) smoothly paved with stones but at its end is the pit of Hades.”

 

Ben Sirach 21:10

 

But the essential message is that most people will choose not to follow God and go the popular route; few will chose the road less traveled that leads to eternal life.[4] Jesus understood very well that decisions determined destiny.

[1]. 1QSa 2.11-12; 1 Enoch 62:14; 2 Enoch 45:2; 2 Baruch 30:4; Mishnah Aboth 3.17.

 

[2]. Fruchtenbaum, The Jewish Foundation of the Life of Messiah: Instructor’s Manual. Class 17, page 12.

 

[3]. Barclay, Jesus. 264.

[4]. Lang, Know the Words of Jesus. 225.

 



  • Chapters