Unit 04 – The Early Years Of Jesus

04.05 The Great Escape And Return

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 14, 2016  -  Comments Off on 04.05 The Great Escape And Return

Unit 04

The Early Years Of Jesus

 

Chapter 05

The Great Escape And Return

 

04.05.00A. JOSEPH, MARY, AND JESUS RETURN FROM EGYPT. Artwork by William Hole of the Royal Scottish Academy of Art, 1876. (2)

04.05.00A. JOSEPH, MARY, AND JESUS RETURN FROM EGYPT. Artwork by William Hole of the Royal Scottish Academy of Art, 1876. While the artist’s rendering shows the Holy Family walking alone, this was certainly not the case. People normally traveled in regularly scheduled caravans whenever possible for protection since traveling alone was always an invitation to be robbed and possibly killed.  Often artists illustrate the woman riding on a donkey.  This would have been the case only in the event of her pregnancy, sickness, or injury. This artistic depiction is historically accurate in that Mary would have walked and carried a small child on her hip or shoulder.



04.05.01 Introduction

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 12, 2016  -  Comments Off on 04.05.01 Introduction

04.05.01 Introduction

The news of a king being born in his kingdom did not fit well with Herod.  He too must have heard some of the many rumors that a national deliverer was soon to be born. The paranoid Herod the Great was determined not to permit anyone to challenge his throne.



04.05.02 ESCAPE TO EGYPT

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 12, 2016  -  Comments Off on 04.05.02 ESCAPE TO EGYPT

04.05.02 Mt. 2:13-15 Egypt

 

ESCAPE TO EGYPT

 13 After they were gone, an angel of the Lord suddenly appeared to Joseph in a dream, saying, “Get up! Take the child and His mother, flee to Egypt, and stay there until I tell you. For Herod is about to search for the child to destroy Him.” 14 So he got up, took the child and His mother during the night, and escaped to Egypt. 15 He stayed there until Herod’s death, so that what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet might be fulfilled: Out of Egypt I called My Son.  (Hosea 11:1)

 

The first thought of Egypt by Bible students is that it was the land of Israelite slavery. But for centuries it had been a place of refuge. Even Jeremiah was there for a while. In fact, some cities, such as Alexandria, had a significant Jewish population by the first century B.C.[1] Trade and commerce was brisk between Egypt and Israel, but Herod constantly feared his throne would be challenged by a number of conspirators.

Joseph received his second dream. Certainly he knew the stories of the Egyptian Pharaoh, Haman, and Antiochus IV Epiphanes, and others who tried to wipe out the Jewish people. “So he got up … during the night and escaped to Egypt.”  Joseph took Mary and Jesus and fled to Egypt due to the warning given by the angel. In all probability, they took the small connector road from Bethlehem to the Ridge Route to the coastal Via Maris and then went on to Egypt. Traveling alone was extremely dangerous,[2] especially with the gifts given to them by the magi.  But if an angel warned them about the impending danger of Herod, that messenger certainly would have provided all the protection they needed in their journey.  After three days’ journey from Bethlehem, they reached the Rhinokolura Wadi (modern Wadi al-Arish),[3] which was the border between Egypt and Judea. Once they crossed the seasonal riverbed, they continued their journey without fear from Herod.[4]

 

04.05.02.Q1 Where in Egypt did Mary, Joseph, and Jesus go?

Their place of residency has been lost in history, but two possible cities have been suggested.

  1. Alexandria, built by Alexander the Great, was a major Jewish center. It was larger than any city in Judea, with an estimated forty percent Jewish population. It had a synagogue so huge that a courier was needed to repeat the words of the rabbi so the people in the back of the auditorium could hear.  It was in this city where the Hebrew Scriptures had been translated into Greek some two and a half centuries earlier.   Joseph could have quickly found a home and employment there as a young carpenter, although the funds provided by the magi most certainly would have been sufficient.  While Alexandria would have been an ideal city for them, it is also further west than many other Jewish communities. Therefore, it seems rather unlikely Mary and Joseph would have traveled so far to the western side of the Nile.[5]
  1. The second opinion is a popular tradition that the Holy Family lived in the Old Coptic Quarter of the city of Old Cairo. It is where legend says the Church of St. Sergiust marks the traditional site where Mary and Joseph lived for three months. Coptic Christians for centuries claimed that it was there, in a crypt that was originally a cave or grotto that the infant Jesus was laid to rest.  However, there is a problem with this traditional site. Cairo was not founded until A.D. 641, and then it was simply a military outpost. Eventually a town known as al-Fustat grew around the outpost and was later renamed Cairo. Just as the Holy Land has its share of legends, so does Egypt. So this is hardly a serious contender for where Mary and Joseph could have stayed. Where the Holy Family resided in Egypt is known only to God.

04.05.02.Z. A MAP OF THE HOLY FAMILY’S ROUTE TO FROM EGYPT

 04.05.02.Z A MAP OF THE HOLY FAMILY’S ROUTE TO/FROM EGYPT. Map of the routes likely taken by Joseph, Mary and Jesus from Nazareth to Bethlehem, to Egypt, and their return to Nazareth. When they crossed the “River of Egypt,” known today as the Wadi of Egypt, or Wadi El Arish (1 Kgs. 8:65) and entered Egypt, they were safe from Herod’s army.  Courtesy of International Mapping and Dan Przywara.   

 

A Lesson in First Century Hermeneutics:

04.05.02.X Use Of A Double Reference[6]

 

“Out of Egypt I called my son.”   This is not so much a  prophecy by Hosea concerning the return of Jesus from Egypt, as it is a double reference to the historical deliverance of the Jewish people out of Egyptian bondage (Ex. 4:22).  Yet the meaning of the prophet’s words is said to be confusing because there is no mention of a messiah.  The verse reads as follows:

When Israel was a child, I loved him,
and out of Egypt I called My son.

Hosea 11:1

 

A preacher once clarified the meaning with a riddle.  He told the congregation to listen (or read) the following five points and guess who the subject is.

  1. Without a miracle in his mother’s womb he would never have been born.
  2. As an infant he was taken to Egypt.
  3. He returned from Egypt to the Promised Land.
  4. He saw signs and wonders, and the hand of God moved for him.
  5. He was killed by his enemies, rose from death, and will live forever into eternity.

 

Nearly everyone immediately identified the subject as Jesus.  However, the riddle was intended to describe the nation of Israel. He noted these similarities:

  1. Without a divine intervention beginning with Abraham, the Jewish nation would never have been born.
  2. When a deadly famine fell upon the land of Canaan, the fledgling nation of less than a hundred souls went to Egypt.
  3. In God’s timing, they returned from Egypt to the Promised Land (Canaan).
  4. As they left Egypt, they witnessed profound signs and wonders that demonstrated the hand of God for all nations to see.
  5. In A.D. 70 the Roman armies killed national Israel, but in 1948 the nation was reborn and will live forever into eternity.

 

Theologians call this type of genre of Hosea 11:1 a “double reference,” that is, it describes both the life of national Israel and the life of Jesus. Matthew recognized the history of the Hebrew children as a “type and shadow” of Jesus.[7]  But the imagery goes further: Just as God through Moses led His people out of Egyptian bondage and to the border of the Promised Land, so Jesus would lead His people out of the bondage of sin and into the Kingdom of God.[8]  In fact, all dealings God had with His people in the Old Testament Period were in some manner preparatory for the coming Messiah.  Jesus is the realization and fulfillment of their salvation.  The Gentiles are privileged to be grafted into these blessings of Abraham (Rom. 9-11).  However, sometimes it is what the gospel writer does not say that is significant. Notice verse 2 of this Hosea’s passage.

1 When Israel was a child, I loved him,
and out of Egypt I called My son.
2 The more they (the prophets) called them (the people of Israel),
the more they (these people) departed from Me.

Hosea 11:1-2

 

When the Israelite children entered Egypt, they went as a clan; a family.  When they left, they did so as a nation. When Mary, Joseph and the infant Jesus entered Egypt, they entered as a family, but they they left, a new nation was about to be born. Not only were the people of ancient Israel a “type and shadow” of Jesus, but just as they once rejected the authority of Moses and Joshua (verse 2a), so likewise, they rejected Jesus. The first century readers of Matthew’s gospel never missed this important point. Matthew expected his Jewish audience to know this passage and, in essence said, what happened to Israel happened to Jesus.

 

04.05.02a (2)

 

[1]. Some historians have estimated the Jewish population of Alexandria, Egypt, to have been about 250,000 at the time of Christ.

 

[2]. Josephus, Antiquities 20.6.1(118); Wars 2.15.6 (232).

 

[3]. Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica. 1:205. See “Wadi” in Appendix 26.

 

[4]. Farrar, Life of Christ. 17.

[5]. Maier, In the Fullness of Time. 73.

[6]. See “The Law Of Double Reference.” (Part 1, No. 6) in Appendix 30.

 

[7]. See “Type and Shadow” in Appendix 26 and “The Law Of Typological Interpretation Of Prophetic Words” (Part 1, No. 5) in Appendix 30.

 

[8]. Pentecost, The Words and Works of Jesus Christ. 70.



04.05.03 BETLEHEM: HEROD ORDERS THE SLAUGHTER OF YOUNG BOYS

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 12, 2016  -  Comments Off on 04.05.03 BETLEHEM: HEROD ORDERS THE SLAUGHTER OF YOUNG BOYS

04.05.03 Mt. 2:16-18 Bethlehem

 

HEROD ORDERS THE SLAUGHTER OF YOUNG BOYS

 

16 Then Herod, when he saw that he had been outwitted by the wise men, flew into a rage. He gave orders to massacre all the male children in and around Bethlehem who were two years old and under, in keeping with the time he had learned from the wise men. 17 Then what was spoken through Jeremiah the prophet was fulfilled:

18 A voice was heard in Ramah,

                         weeping and great mourning,

Rachel weeping for her children

and she refused to be consoled,                                                                            

because they are no more (Jer. 31:15).

 

There are three reasons why Herod decided to kill the Christ-child.

  1. He was not about to tolerate any potential threat to his monarchy. Under the slightest suspicion, he even murdered his own wives and sons.
  1. He realized that he was tricked by the magi when they failed to return to him as they had originally promised. This was an insult.
  1. It was an insult for the visiting magi, who represented royalty, not to present a gift to Herod. To meet a monarch of another nation, for whatever reason, and not present a gift was a supreme insult – sometimes considered worthy of death.

 

“Massacre all the male children … two years old and under.”  In biblical times mothers often nursed their infants until the age of two.[1] Herod was not about to let any unweaned infants threaten his throne. Therefore, he sent a military unit to the small village and they killed all infant boys under the age of two. Since Bethlehem was a small village, the number of innocent lives massacred was relatively few; scholars believe less than a dozen – but still a horrible and wicked act. This terrible action, known as the Massacre of the Innocents, is typical of the well-earned reputation of Herod the Great.  While he was known for being one of the greatest builders the Roman Empire, he was also known for his immense cruelty to his family and those he ruled.  This slaughter was typical of him.  He even killed most of his ten wives and several sons. This single act of brutality in Bethlehem became the signature for which the great architect and builder is remembered. The account of Herod’s evil act was also recorded by Eusebius, who wrote the following:

Christ, then, having been born, according to the prophecies in Bethlehem of Judea, about the time that had been revealed, Herod was alarmed at the intelligence.  Having ascertained, on the inquiry of the eastern Magi where the king of the Jews should be born, as they had seen his star and this had been the cause of so long a journey to them, glowing with zeal to worship the infant as God, he was under great apprehension supposing his own kingdom to be in danger.  After inquiring of the doctors of the law in the nation where they expected Christ should be born and ascertaining the prophecy of Micah announcing that it would be in Bethlehem, in a single edict he ordered all male infants from two years and below to be slain, both in Bethlehem and all its parts, according to the time that he ascertained from the Magi.  He thought, as seemed probably, that he would carry off Jesus also in the destruction with those of his own age.  The child, however, anticipated the snare, being carried into Egypt by his parents who were informed by an angel of what was to happen.  These same facts are stated in the sacred text of the gospel.

Eusebius, Church History 8.1-2

 

“A voice was heard in Ramah.”  Ramah was a village situated about five miles north of Jerusalem in the land belonging to the tribe of Benjamin.  After the forces of King Nebuchadnezzar destroyed the temple in 587 B.C., they went north to attack Ramah.  Matthew compared this horrific event as a “foreshadow” of the killing of children in Bethlehem by Herod the Great.[2] In a similar manner, an unknown first century writer compared Herod the Great with the slaughter of innocent boys by the Pharaoh of Egypt.

There followed a bold king, not descendant from a priestly family, who was presumptuous and wicked.  He killed old and young, and the whole country was terribly afraid of him.  He ravaged the people with slaughter as had happened in Egypt.

Assumption of Moses 6:22[3]

 

“Rachel weeping for her children.”  These words by the prophet Jeremiah have raised some difficulties. At Ramah the Babylonians killed many and took children as slaves, but there is no evidence of similar atrocities at Bethlehem during the days of either the prophet or Rachel.  So why did he make the connection.  There are two possibilities:

  1. Some scholars have suggested that in Ramah the children were not slaughtered, but were taken from them, whereas in Bethlehem the mothers buried their little sons. So the similarity is not the killing, but the suffering.[4]
  2. However, the most accurate interpretation may be found in the Talmud. It suggests that when the children of Israel were driven by the Babylonian army to Babylon, the road they traveled upon went past the grave of their mother Rachel and they cried bitterly. Hence, Rachel “heard the cries” of her children.[5] In this cultural genre, Rachel heard the cries of the families of Bethlehem.

 

Comparisons were often made between events, even though they were not perfectly aligned in the modern sense of making comparisons.

Finally, critics have pondered that if the story of the Bethlehem massacre was true, why didn’t Josephus mention it? The answer is that Herod had murdered so many of his own family, friends and staff, that the Bethlehem event was not even a minor point.  Furthermore, Josephus may not have known about it.

 

[1]. Smith, Augsburg Commentary on the New Testament: Matthew. 43.   

 

[2]. Gilbrant, “Matthew,” 45; See “types and shadows” in Appendix 26.

[3]. The reader is reminded that quotations from non-biblical sources are not to be understood as being of equal authority with the biblical narratives. See 01.02.04.

 

[4]. Bock, Jesus According to Scripture. 72.

[5]. Cited by Geikie, The Life and Words. 1:557.

 



04.05.04 From Egypt to Nazareth

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 11, 2016  -  Comments Off on 04.05.04 From Egypt to Nazareth

04.05.04 Mt. 2:19-23; Lk. 2:39-40 From Egypt to Nazareth

 

19 After Herod died, an angel of the Lord suddenly appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, 20 saying, “Get up! Take the child and His mother and go to the land of Israel, because those who sought the child’s life are dead.21 So he got up, took the child and His mother, and entered the land of Israel. 22 But when he heard that Archelaus was ruling over Judea in place of his father Herod, he was afraid to go there. And being warned in a dream, he withdrew to the region of Galilee. 23 Then he went and settled in a town called Nazareth to fulfill what was spoken through the prophets, that He will be called a Nazarene.

 

Lk. 39 When they had completed everything according to the law of the Lord, they returned to Galilee, to their own town of Nazareth. 40 The boy grew up and became strong, filled with wisdom, and God’s grace was on Him. 

 

“After Herod died.”  No time frame was given as to how long it was after Herod’s death until an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in another dream.  It may have been only a few days or even months because there were several small revolts throughout the land. Furthermore, it took months for Archelaus to receive his official position as ruler.  Many messianic pretenders arose with their small groups of rebels and chaos and violence spread throughout the land until the strong arm of Roman might brought peace and order.[1]

Since these revolutionaries had messianic aspirations, it is easy to understand why Jesus was frequently silent about His identity. He certainly did not want to be identified with any of them or their cause.  Without the writings of Josephus, information of these nationalistic messianic pretenders would be lost in history.

“Go to the land of Israel.” The phrase meant the entire land of the twelve tribes, not just the ancient area of the ten northern tribes. It was also known as “Judaea” although it comprised the three Jewish provinces of Judea, Galilee and Perea, as well as Samaria and Idumea. However, the name “Judaea” at times also refers only to Judea, Samaria, and Idumea – the area governed by Archelaus and then by Pilate. The Bible refers to it in the Hebrew, Eretz-Israel, but never as Palestine. Yet this is the only place in the New Testament that refers to the Jewish land by the name “Israel,” whereas in other Scriptures the name is associated with “the people of Israel.”[2]

“Because those who sought the child’s life are dead.”  This statement was a reference to Herod the Great who died in 4 B.C.  In Hebrew, a plural form is at times used to denote an indefinite number, or for one of many.[3]  The same is true in Greek.[4]  This phrase is one of several similarities between Moses and Jesus. In fact, Moses is seen as a prophetic picture of Jesus.[5] In this case, the phrase nearly agrees verbatim with the first killing of the innocents in Exodus 4:19.  The Jewish readers of Matthew’s gospel would have immediately connected the two events.[6]

“Archelaus was ruling over Judea in place of his father Herod.”  After Herod’s death his kingdom was divided by the Roman senate among three of his surviving sons and a fourth district was given to the governor of Damascus.  Archelaus received Jerusalem and the district of Judea which included Bethlehem.  He was a tyrant, worse than his father but with none of his father’s administrative skills. Life became so unbearable that the Jews rebelled.  Archelaus, fearful that his government might fall, he…

… Sent out the whole army upon them (the Jews), and sent the horsemen to prevent those that had their tents without the temple, from assisting those that were within the temple, and to kill such as ran away from the footmen when they thought themselves out of danger; which the horsemen slew three thousand men, while the rest went to the neighboring mountains.                         

Josephus, Antiquities 17.9.3 (217b-218a)[7]

 

While in Egypt, an angel warned Joseph in a dream not to return to Bethlehem. Unknown to Israel at this time was that Archelaus would be more of a tyrant that was his father. In fact, so much so, that after a decade of dictatorial rulership, the people rebelled in one of the most horrific revolts during the life of Jesus.[8]  This anarchy soon became too much for Rome and Archelaus was replaced by Coponius.[9] In the meantime, the Holy Family was safe in Nazareth.

“To fulfill what was spoken through the prophets.”  This portion of Scripture has been problematic, since the prophecy is not found anywhere in the Old Testament.  However, note that Matthew used the word “was spoken” and not “written.” There are three possibilities to understanding this issue:

  1. He may have referred to a popular teaching within the Oral Law or tradition.
  1. He may have referred to a reader in the synagogue who read the prophecy publically.
  1. He could have referred to the general tenor of prophecy and not to a specific prophecy by a particular prophet.

 

Furthermore, at this time the Jews had both the Written Law and their Oral Law.  When anyone was reading, it was aloud, since silent reading was an unknown skill at this time.  Hence, the phrase “what was spoken” could have referred to either the Written Scripture or Oral laws.

04.05.04a (2)

 

04.05.04.Q1 How could the prophet Isaiah (11:1) identify Jesus as a “Nazarene” when there was no village by that name when the prophet lived?  

 

This is an interesting question since Isaiah lived around 700 B.C., and Nazareth was established late in the Inter-Testamental period, meaning, there were about 500 to 600 years between the prophet and the establishment of the small farming village. Previously Matthew mentioned that the birth of Jesus was announced by a “rising” star (Mt. 2:1-2). The term “rising” (anatole) can also mean growth or shoot and in Isaiah 11:1 shoot and branch are parallels.[10] At Qumran, the writers of the Dead Sea Scrolls called the Messiah the Branch of David, a term that precisely fits the wording of Matthew.[11] Therefore, the phrase, “That He will be called a Nazarene,” is a play on words (mnemonic)[12] that reflects upon the shoot of Jessie, referring to a prophecy given by Isaiah and explained below.

Then a shoot will grow from the stump of Jesse,
and a branch from his roots will bear fruit.

Isaiah 11:1

 

A Lesson in First Century Hermeneutics:

04.05.04.X A Word Play Known As A Mnemonic

 

In every language there are word plays – two words that sound alike but have different, sometimes opposite, meanings.  At times word plays create humor and other times they are ideal teaching tools. The words shoot, branch, and Nazareth, have the same root word (Netzer).   The debate hinges on whether the Greek word for “Nazareth” derives from Hebrew netzer, or nezer, meaning branch, or nazar, meaning to consecrate.[13]  Those who claim there is a connection to netzer, base their opinions on the phrase “Netzer-shoot planted by God” found in the Dead Sea Scroll 1QH 6:15; 7:5, 8, 10. Since Netzer is the root word for Nazareth, what Matthew is saying is that Jesus is the Netzer or Branch that came out of the root of Jesse – the father of King David. This is clearly a play on words known as a mnemonic,[14] that is, a word arrangement in such a manner that it is easily remembered by the listeners.[15]  This functioned,

  1. As a memory tool and
  1. Indicated that the matter was of Divine origin.

 

Jesus, as the Master Teacher and like a typical rabbi, used puns and plays on words. In this case, the memory tool of nazar and Netzer apparently had a divine origin.

 

< ——————————————– >

 

“They returned to Galilee, to their own town of Nazareth” This passage in Luke 2:39 suggests that the holy family returned to Nazareth immediately following the completion of the Mosaic Law requirements, 41 days after the birth of Jesus.  But this is hardly the case as indicated in the other gospels. Luke evidently felt that some details were not needed for his purpose. He did not mention the visit of the magi, the killing of the innocents and the escape of the holy family, their flight to Egypt, and their return to Nazareth. Luke 2:39 is not out of chronological order but simply does not have those details.  There are two important considerations concerning the segment of history that was not recorded by Luke:

  1. In Jewish writings, it was not uncommon to skip large periods of time. Even though Luke said that his work was a chronological account that does not mean he could not skip periods of time or events.
  1. The other gospels offer additional light to the childhood years of Jesus. Therefore, readers know that between the time “Joseph and Mary had done everything required by the Law of the Lord” and their arrival at Nazareth, they journeyed to Egypt.

 

Luke 2:39 reveals the importance that all four gospels must be read together as a single unit to attain an accurate understanding of the life and work of Jesus.

The question has been asked why Archelaus had an incredible hatred and bitterness toward his subjects.  It is because after his father died the Jews sent an embassy of fifty men to Rome to appeal to Augustus not to have him as their king.  But Augustus decreed that he would be their ruler, but without the title of “king” that he so passionately wanted. As a result, he spilled out his vengeance toward the people until Rome removed him from office. This event became the background for the parable in Luke 19:11-27.

“The boy grew up.” The Jewish people marked the development of their children in eight stages as follows:

  1. The birth of a child (Isa. 9:6)
  1. The nursing stage (Sa. 9:8)
  1. When the suckling child begins to ask for food (Lam. 4:4)
  1. When the child is weaned off its mother’s breast (Isa. 28:9)
  1. When the child clings to its mother’s side (Jer. 40:7)
  1. When the child becomes firm and strong (Isa. 7:14)
  1. Youthful years
  1. The ripened one or warrior (Isa. 31:8)

 

Parents observed their children carefully in their growing years. There can be little question that Mary and Joseph noticed a difference from other children, especially after the Passover event when Jesus was 12 years old.

 

[1]. A partial listing of an estimated 60 messianic pretenders is found in Appendix 25 “False Prophets, Rebels, Significant Events, And Rebellions That Impacted The First Century Jewish World.”

 

[2]. The name “Palestine” was not used until a century after Christ.  It was instituted as a curse word by Emperor Hadrian in A.D.135.

 

[3]. See Exodus 4:19, where the Lord said to Moses, “Go back to Egypt, for all the men who wanted to kill you are dead.” Scholars believe “all the men” is a reference to Pharaoh Thutmose III.  See New International Version Study Bible footnotes; Bullinger, Figures of Speech Used in the Bible. 532.

[4]. Wallace, Greek Grammar. 404.

[5]. See Appendix 2.

 

[6]. Hagner, “Matthew 1-13.” 39.

 

[7]. Parenthesis mine; See also Josephus, Wars 2.1.3.

 

[8]. See Appendix 25 for a listing of false prophets who had messianic expectations and for a partial listing of revolts and social disturbances from 63 B.C. to A.D. 135.

 

[9]. Tenney, New Testament Times. 143; Josephus, Wars. 2.8.1.

[10]. See also Jer. 23:5; 33:15; Zech. 3:8; 6:2   

 

[11]. Dead Sea Scroll 4QpIsa; 4QPat. BI. 3.4; 4QFlor. 10; Cited by Smith, Augsburg Commentary on the New Testament: Matthew. 45.    

 

[12]. See “mnemonic” in Appendix 26.

 

[13]. Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament. 1:22; Bock, Jesus According to Scripture. 73.

[14]. Bullinger, Figures of Speech Used in the Bible. 710.

[15]. Barclay, “Matthew.” 1:13.

 



04.06 The Boyhood Years Of Jesus

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 11, 2016  -  Comments Off on 04.06 The Boyhood Years Of Jesus

Unit 04

The Early Years Of Jesus

 

Chapter 06

The Boyhood Years Of Jesus

 

04.06.00.A. JESUS AND TEMPLE LEADERS. Artwork by William Hole of the Royal Scottish Academy of Art, 1876. (2)

04.06.00.A. JESUS AND TEMPLE LEADERS. Artwork by William Hole of the Royal Scottish Academy of Art, 1876.  At the age of 12, Jesus challenges the religious leaders in the temple with stimulating questions. Among the doctors of the law, there may have been Rabbi Hillel and his rival Rabbi Shammai, two of the most famous rabbis of the Second Temple Period (516 B.C.-A.D. 70). The octagon-shaped architectural style of the building depicted is attractive, but incorrect.



04.06.01 Introduction

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 11, 2016  -  Comments Off on 04.06.01 Introduction

04.06.01 Introduction

Little is known of the early years of Jesus from the age of twelve until the beginning of His ministry. But what is known is that He was obedient to his parents (Lk 2:51), He “grew in wisdom and stature and in favor with God and men” (Lk 2:52), and He did not have any formal rabbinic training either in the Hebrew Scriptures or the Oral Law (Mk 6:2; Jn. 7:15).

There is, however, general information of what life was like for a young boy.  Synagogues in the Province of Galilee were used as schools, where the rabbi taught all children the five books of Moses, unlike in Jerusalem where only boys were taught.[1]  During the sunny, dry days they often had classes outside under a fig tree.  Since this tree produces fruit for nearly ten months of the year, it became symbolic of the Word of God from which men were taught to “eat” constantly.  It was in these schools that children were taught an elementary level of reading skills. Writing was less popular.  There was little need for writing skills in this primitive culture, with the occasional exception of legal documents which were written by professional scribes.

The common languages were Greek, Hebrew, and its sister language, Aramaic.[2]  Greek was introduced by Alexander the Great some three centuries earlier. Aramaic was the language Jewish people spoke during their exile in Babylon.  However, Hebrew remained the religious language for religious events among the Jews in Israel while it passed from use in other communities such as in Egypt. It is generally accepted that Jesus read from a Hebrew scroll, spoke to the crowds in Aramaic, and conversed with the Roman authorities in Aramaic or Greek.

Jesus, who was taught to recite the Hallel (Ps. 114-118), which means praise. He was also the personification of it.  Note the identifying connections,

(114:1)             He is the One who came out of Egypt;

(114:8)             He was the Rock from which flowed water;

(115:2)             He was the answer to the question, “Where is their God.”

(116:3)             He was the anguish of the grave;

(116:4)             He called upon the name of the Lord;

(116:14, 18)     He completed His vows to the Lord;

(116:48)           He delivered the captives from captivity;

(117)                The love covenant of God

(118)                His ultimate triumph over rejection

(118:22)           He was the stone that the builders rejected.

(118:25-26)     Messianic Parousia (Second Coming)

 

As a child Jesus attended the community synagogue in Nazareth where His teacher was the local rabbi. But according to Isaiah, every morning God awakened Jesus and instructed Him (Isa. 50:4-5).  Therefore, by the age of twelve He had become a profound scholar and demonstrated incredible wisdom by asking questions of the brightest priestly scholars of the Second Temple Period.

The Lord God has given Me the tongue of those who are instructed to know how to sustain the weary with a word. He awakens Me each morning; He awakens My ear to listen like those being instructed.

Isaiah 50:4

 

[1]. For more information in the educational system, see 02.03.04.

 

[2]. For more information the languages, see 02.03.08.



04.06.02 Jerusalem: JESUS VISITS THE TEMPLE

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 11, 2016  -  Comments Off on 04.06.02 Jerusalem: JESUS VISITS THE TEMPLE

04.06.02 Lk. 2:41-50 Jerusalem

 

JESUS VISITS THE TEMPLE

41 Every year His parents traveled to Jerusalem for the Passover Festival. 42 When He was 12 years old, they went up according to the custom of the festival. 43 After those days were over, as they were returning, the boy Jesus stayed behind in Jerusalem, but His parents did not know it. 44 Assuming He was in the traveling party, they went a day’s journey. Then they began looking for Him among their relatives and friends.       45 When they did not find Him, they returned to Jerusalem to search for Him. 46 After three days, they found Him in the temple complex sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions. 47 And all those who heard Him were astounded at His understanding and His answers.

48 When His parents saw Him, they were astonished, and His mother said to Him, “Son, why have You treated us like this? Your father and I have been anxiously searching for You.”

49 “Why were you searching for Me?” He asked them. “Didn’t you know that I had to be in My Father’s house?” 50 But they did not understand what He said to them.

 

“Every year his parents traveled to Jerusalem.” This refers to the annual celebration of Passover (Heb. Pesach) in the Holy City. Those who lived great distances away, such as Nazareth, were not required to make the long journey.  However, Mary and Joseph, being righteous Jews, chose to observe all seven of our Lord’s feasts which were condensed into three festival periods.[1] Local residents observed them three times a year, those of a moderate distance observed only Passover in the month of Nisan, and those who lived in distant countries might only observe the Passover in Jerusalem once in a lifetime.  Originally, attendance was required of all men (Ex. 23:14-17; Deut. 16:16).  Women were free of the obligation, but frequently attended with their husbands.[2] The fact that Mary chose to go reflects upon her dedication to worship her Lord at this sacred festival.

Traveling was dangerous, as Zealots and bandits were in the countryside waiting to take advantage of unsuspecting travelers.[3] For this reason, pilgrims going to and from Jerusalem for religious observances traveled in festival caravans.[4] The village was, in effect, an extended family and closely-knit community.  Children would play together as they traveled the long journey which skirted around the District of Samaria.  It was common for parents not to know where one or more of their children were, as it was assumed that they were in the good hands and care of someone else from the village. So when Mary and Joseph discovered Jesus was missing, the news was a major concern for everyone.  Child abduction was virtually unknown, so they returned to Jerusalem and searched for Him. That meant they had to travel alone, without group protection, along the roads where there had been many robberies and wild animals roamed freely. They also had to cross the Jordan River known to have crocodiles.[5] So when they eventually found Him in the temple, they were understandably quite upset.

On a related issue, if all the villagers went to the temple in festival caravans that meant that their homes were unprotected and vulnerable to the bandits.  Then the bandits would not need to rob the travelers, they just had to wait until everyone left and they could help themselves. Therefore, not everyone went to the temple. And for that reason, designated families offered sacrifices for friends who stayed home to protect the village. The families that went to the temple were considered to be the honored, the most observant families of the village.  That makes the family of Mary and Joseph rather stunning – they went to the temple every year, not only for themselves, but probably to give sacrifices for other families as well.[6]

“When he was 12 years old.” During a child’s twelfth year he or she was examined by rabbis to determine if the basics of Judaism and the responsibilities of adulthood were understood. Reciting the Shema was how a pre-teen acknowledged that he was under the rule of God and, in fact, had taken upon himself the “Kingdom of God.”[7]  In essence, the child examined his or her own heart for the need of God in their life. Then, on the day after the thirteenth birthday, he or she became responsible for his or her own spiritual welfare and a son/daughter of the commandments.  On the New Testament side, anyone at any age can come to God when they recognize their need for God. In both Judaism and Christianity the adult, not the child, makes the decision to accept or reject God, rather than a choice being made by parents for an infant. Younger children, however, are still dedicated to God in both Judaism and Christianity.

As such, the young adult entered a new phase of life with new responsibilities and privileges.  For boys these included the reading of the Torah in the synagogue, its interpretation, and reciting the Shema with its benediction.[8]  While this usually occurred in the village synagogue, it appears that Jesus, of His own accord, had a similar discussion with the priests on the temple steps.  The Mishnah gives evidence of the customary examination:

A boy twelve years old and one day – his vows must be examined; if he is thirteen years old and one day, his vows are valid, but they must be examined throughout his thirteenth year.

Mishnah, Niddah 5.6[9]

 

According to a second century (B.C.) rabbi, Eleazar ben Simeon, a young man became responsible for his own actions from the age of thirteen and one day, although still under the guiding hand of his father for another year. At age 13 and 1 day he became a ben hat-torah, or Son of the Law. As such he began to wear the tephillin (Heb.), or phylacteries (Greek), and was presented in the synagogue on the Sabbath. He became responsible for fulfilling all the commandments[10] and legal actions, with the exception of the purchase of real estate, payment of taxes, and military duty, which began at the age of twenty.[11] Prior to this rite of passage he was known as a katon, meaning little, but afterwards he was known as a gadol, meaning grown-up.

The discussion Jesus had with the priests would have been mainly about the Torah. Matthew said that Jesus met with the temple priests, who found Him to be mature far beyond His years in the understanding of the Torah and other Old Testament books. What an unusual sight to have seen Jesus sitting on the temple steps with the best teachers of the Law. Normally, children were gathered around their teachers who taught them, but on this day, Jesus was on the temple steps and the teachers were gathered around Him.  What could these teachers have been thinking?  There is little question that they would watch him carefully in the years to come.

Here lies an example of Old Testament law and New Testament grace.  It is the similarity of becoming a son of the Commandment for a Jewish boy and becoming a believer for a Christian.

04.06.02.A. MODERN BAR MITZVAH CELEBRATION IN JERUSALEM

04.06.02.A. MODERN BAR MITZVAH CELEBRATION IN JERUSALEM.  A thirteen-year old boy carries a Torah Scroll as the men of his family celebrate his Bar Mitzvah (Bat Mitzvah for girls) at the Western Wall. The women are nearby and look on. It is a time of celebration when a son or daughter becomes responsible for their spiritual destiny. This rite of passage has become more celebratory today than it was in the days of Jesus. Photograph by the author.

 

Finally, some Christian teachers have incorrectly said that at this time, the Jewish rite of passage known as the bar-mitzvah occurred at the age of 12, but that was changed to 13 in the Middle Ages.  That is an inaccurate understanding.  During the 12th year the pre-teen was examined and after the 13th birthday, there was a small bar-mitzvah celebration for boys and a bat-mitzvah for girls. Only in the Middle Ages did this rite of passage become a significant family and congregational event.[12]

“Sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions.” It is rather astounding that a twelve-year old boy would have a dialog with the doctors of theology and Jewish law (both Written and Oral), especially since He only attended the local synagogue school and had no further training.  This leads to a very interesting question:

 

04.06.02.Q1 How did Jesus attain the incredible knowledge that He displayed at the temple when He was merely twelve years old (Lk. 2:41-50)?

Scholars have long debated the “messianic consciousness” of Jesus.[13] In other words, when did He realize that He was the Messiah? Since Jesus had both the human nature and divine nature, He would have access to His Father in heaven that was unknown to mortals. Another question then is, “At the temple, did He ask questions to discover answers or did He ask questions to have the scholars reflect upon Isaiah?  According to Isaiah, every morning God awakened Jesus and instructed Him (Isa. 50:4-5). That instruction included knowledge of the events that would eventually inflict horrific pain (Isa. 50:6-9). Furthermore, Philippians 2:5-11 and Acts 1:6-7 state that the incarnate God was willing to be separated from His full use of divine knowledge, thereby making human development and maturity a necessity.

4 The Lord God has given Me the tongue of those who are instructed to know how to sustain the weary with a word. He awakens Me each morning; He awakens My ear to listen like those being instructed.

5 The Lord God has opened My ear, and I was not rebellious; I did not turn back.

6 I gave My back to those who beat Me, and My cheeks to those who tore out My beard. I did not hide My face from scorn and spitting.

7 The Lord God will help Me; therefore I have not been humiliated; therefore I have set My face like flint, and I know I will not be put to shame.

8 The One who vindicates Me is near; who will contend with Me? Let us confront each other. Who has a case against Me? Let him come near Me!

9 In truth, the Lord God will help Me; who will condemn Me? Indeed, all of them will wear out like a garment; a moth will devour them.

Isaiah 50:4-9

 

Therefore, when Jesus met the religious scholars in the temple, He not only offered thought-provoking answers, but questions that challenged the best scholars of the entire second temple period (515 B.C. – A.D. 70). Little did they know that the Boy who was before them was divinely taught every morning.

 

04.05.06a (2)

 

The dynamics of the temple dialog were heightened in light of the fact that the two greatest theological schools of the entire Second Temple Period existed at this time.  These schools were the House of Hillel and the House of Shammai.  Their founding rabbis are believed to have been still alive and were probably in the temple when Jesus came.  It was in Solomon’s Portico where the greatest of teachers taught, as if trying to capture some of the proverbial “Solomon’s wisdom.” Anyone who seriously desired to learn would have studied in one of these schools (a/k/a “houses”).

It was considered a point of academic excellence to have graduated from one of these two schools, as exampled by the Apostle Paul who had studied under Gamaliel, the grandson of Hillel.[14] There can be little question that the twelve-year-old Jesus challenged the most important and influential rabbis when other twelve-year old boys were challenged by their local rabbis.

 04.06.02b (2)

 

“His understanding.” The phrase means not only facts, but also the relationships of those with whom He was speaking.[15] He had the gift of discernment to understand those with whom He was speaking.

“Son, why have you treated us like this?” The question reflects a tone of contention in the family.  One can understand why parents would be upset if a child was missing for three days. On the other hand, maybe Mary and Joseph should have been aware that since the 12th year was a special year in a child’s life, something unusual should have been expected.  However, His parents were not only upset that they spent three days looking for their Son, but they had to return to Jerusalem and then Nazareth by themselves.  In doing so, they risked themselves to the dangers of robbers who knew that festival pilgrims always had offerings and sacrificial money. But Jesus was already focused on His divine calling while His parents were still expecting a somewhat normal child in spite of His unusual birth and calling. His family did not completely understand Him until after the resurrection.

No wonder Mary would later ponder these things in her heart.  She did find Jesus at the temple, yet in another sense she may never have found him; she may never have felt that this young Man was really hers.  They may have wondered if He was to be another Onias ha-M’agel, a/k/a Honi who performed miracles and was killed.[16]

When Jesus said that “I had to be in my Father’s house,” He implicated more than a physical presence; He had to be involved in the work of Him who awakened and instructed Him every morning. At the age of 12, or possibly 17,[17]  every boy became an apprentice – he worked with a craftsman or tradesman from whom he learned his future occupation.  So when Jesus said that He had to be about His “Father’s business,” or His “Father’s house,” He clearly understood His purpose and divine calling at an early age and was eager to prepare for it.

 

[1]. See Appendix 5 “Levitical and Non-Levitical Feasts.”

 

[2]. Mishnah, Hagigah 1.1; 1 Sam. 1:7; 2:19; see Appendix 5, the Jewish Sacred Calendar.

 

[3]. Josephus, Antiquities 20.6.1(118); Wars 2.15.6 (232).

 

[4]. Tosephta, Megillah 4.15; Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus. 59, 75, 249; Geikie, The Life and Works of Christ. 2:278; Farrar, The Life of Christ. 364.

 

[5]. Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica. 1:220-21; Farrar, The Life of Christ 59-60.

 

[6]. Fischer, The Gospels in Their Jewish Context. (Lecture on CD/MP3). Week 8, Session 2.

 

[7]. Lang, Know the Words of Jesus. 228.    

 

[8]. Mishnah, Megillah 4.6.

[9]. See also Babylonian Talmud, Seder Moed. Yoma 82a; Babylonian Talmud, Seder Tohoroth 45b.

[10]. Mishnah, Avot 5:1; cf. Yoma 82a; Kaplan “Bar Mitzvah, Bat Mitzvah.” CD-ROM Judaica Multimedia.

[11]. A thirteen-year old, even in ancient times, was not considered knowledgeable about buying and selling real estate.  See Maim. Yad., Edut, 9:8; Kaplan. “Bar Mitzvah, Bat Mitzvah.” CD-ROM Judaica Multimedia.

[12]. Wice.  “Bar Mitzvah.” 2:73; Kaplan “Bar Mitzvah, Bat Mitzvah.” CD-ROM Judaica Multimedia; The earliest writing of a bar mitzvah is known today is from the work of Mordecai ben Hillel, a German Halachist of the 13th century.

[13]. See “Christology” and “Messianic Consciousness” in Appendix 26.

 

[14]. Hillel had a son Simeon who served in the temple when Jesus was dedicated. Simeon had a son named Gamaliel, who had a son also named Simeon.  See Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica. 2:31.

 

[15]. Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament. 1:278.

 

[16]. Honi was a miracle worker of the first century B.C. and is noted for making it rain one time.  See comments on Jn. 19:25-27, and 03.05.10.

[17]. See “Education” in 02.03.04.



04.06.03 Nazareth GROWING UP IN NAZARETH

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 11, 2016  -  Comments Off on 04.06.03 Nazareth GROWING UP IN NAZARETH

04.06.03 Lk. 2:51-52 Nazareth

 

 GROWING UP IN NAZARETH

 

51 Then He went down with them and came to Nazareth and was obedient to them. His mother kept all these things in her heart. 52 And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and with people.

“Jesus increased in wisdom and stature.” Jesus grew up like any other boy, but remained sinless; He left part of His deity in heaven.  The fact that Luke stated that Jesus “grew” in wisdom discredits some apocryphal accounts, in which Jesus was described to have had unusual mystical powers in His childhood.  Likewise, there is no truth to the account that Jesus lacked formal education. In fact, average Jewish peasants were better educated than their peers in neighboring cultures. Formal education began as early as the beginning of the Second Temple Period (ca. 515 B.C.), when Levites were given the responsibility of teaching the people (2 Ch. 17:8-9).  Eighty years before Jesus, Rabbi Shimeon ben Shetah decreed that all children and youth under the age of seventeen be instructed in formal education[1] and the Mishnah preserved the various stages of this instruction from childhood to priesthood.[2] While it is unknown if this decree was universally applied in Galilee, it is known that both boys and girls were educated until the age of thirteen.

During those years children learned the Torah beginning at the age of five and the Oral Law beginning at eight.  In the local synagogue He would have learned how to read and write with the use of a wax board and stylus.  The primary teaching method was question and answer, which naturally led to an adult pastime of theological debates. When He became a son of the Commandment at age thirteen and one day, then it was time to learn his father’s trade.  He would remain there approximately eighteen years until the age of thirty, the age when men normally entered the priesthood (or ministry). Matthew summarized those years quite well when he said, “Jesus grew in wisdom and stature and in favor with God and men.”  As righteous orthodox Jews, His parents raised Him according to all the laws of Judaism, which included the following:

Rabben Gamaliel the son of Rabbi Judah the Patriarch said: “Excellent is study of the Law together with worldly occupation, for toil in them both puts sin out of mind.  But all study of the Law without (worldly) labor comes to naught at the last and brings sin in its train.”

Mishnah, Aboth 2.2

 

Early in His life, He was taught the stories of Israel’s heroes by His mother. Some of whom fought on the great battlefields of Esdraelon which is plainly visible from the hills around Nazareth. To the south is the plateau of Gilboa where King Saul fought his last battle.  Not far from Nazareth was the Via Maris, the international highway that went from Egypt to Damascus and connected to the road to Babylon.[3] Ancient kings traveled on this road with their invading armies. Jesus grew up in a quiet village, but not far away there was rich Jewish history that He could reach out and touch.

04.06.03.A. SHEPHERD BOYS IN AUTHENTIC FIRST CENTURY COSTUME

04.06.03.A. SHEPHERD BOYS IN AUTHENTIC FIRST CENTURY COSTUME. These two children holding a sheep at the reconstructed Nazareth Village are dressed in clothes much as Jesus would have worn. Photograph by the author.

 

In favor with God and with people.” A similar theme is found in Luke 2:40. Jesus became the popular son of Nazareth, being well appreciated and liked by everybody.  What a stark contrast to His later return to do miracles and preach the Kingdom of God, when these same friendly people would threaten to kill him.  He was a responsible Son, similar to the description of 1 Samuel 2:26 and Proverbs 3:4.

Most events in the life of Jesus were never recorded.  What is known is that the central focus of any young man was the study of the Torah as the “source and grantor of salvation.”[4]  Even if he did not pursue higher education that was that provided by the local synagogue, he dedicated himself to memorizing numerous pages of the biblical scrolls.  Men often gathered to discuss the meaning and life application of the sacred Scriptures.  One can safely assume Jesus functioned well in this capacity, as He did with the temple priests when He was twelve years old.

 

Unit 04

The Early Years Of Jesus

 

Chapter 07

Village Life In Nazareth

 

04.07.00.A. JESUS GROWING UP IN NAZARETH. Artwork by William Hole of the Royal Scottish Academy of Art, 1876. (2)

04.07.00.A. JESUS GROWING UP IN NAZARETH. Artwork by William Hole of the Royal Scottish Academy of Art, 1876. Jesus is shown with His mother carrying water from the only water fountain in Nazareth. This was a daily event except on the Sabbath. Some scholars believe the village was founded in the first or second century B.C., and was little more than a small agricultural village of three dozen Jewish homes.

 

[1]. Babylonian Talmud, Ketubbot 50b.

 

[2]. Mishnah, Avot 5:21; See 02.03.04.

 

[3]. Also known as “the way of the land of the Philistines” (Ex. 13:17; Num. 20:17).

 

[4]. Neuser, Rabbinic Judaism. 56.



04.07.01 Daily Life in Nazareth

Bill Heinrich  -  Jan 11, 2016  -  Comments Off on 04.07.01 Daily Life in Nazareth

04.07.01 Daily Life in Nazareth

The village of Nazareth was nestled in the hills of Galilee. Yet strange as it may be, there were three provincial Jewish districts: Galilee, Perea east of the Jordan River, and Judea which surrounded Jerusalem. The southeastern corner of Galilee barely touched Perea.  Otherwise, Galilee was surrounded by non-Jewish people.  In fact, the name Galilee comes from the Hebrew word Galil which means circle – but the district of Galilee is anything but circular.[1]

 Video Insert    >

04.07.01.V1 Jesus as a Carpenter or “Tekton.” Mr. Majd Shufani explains the research that was done to build the reconstructed Nazareth Village.  He then explains the Greek term tekton, meaning carpenter, and the type of activities that Jesus as a carpenter would have performed. (8:00)


 

Daily life in the first century was extremely difficult with no modern conveniences commonly taken for granted today.  Houses were cold and damp in the winter and the summer nights were so hot and humid that many slept on roofs tops. Today visitors to Israel can visit reconstructed villages at the Hasmonean Village, the Katzrim Talmudic Village, the Nazareth Village, and the Biblical Garden at Yad Hashmonah, to get a glimpse of what ancient life was like. Great care has been taken at these living museums to present an authentic re-creation of daily life in the days of Jesus.

Video Insert    >

04.07.01.V2 The Home of a Typical Jewish Peasant Family. Dr. Bill Heinrich gives a brief description of a typical Jewish home as found in the mountain regions of Israel, while Mr. Majd Shufani describes the typical first century house in Nazareth.  

 

The English word for carpenter is often said to have come from the Greek word tekton,[2] meaning builder or craftsman (Mk. 6:3a).[3] A master builder or director of works would have been known by the Greek term architekton (753; cf 1 Cor. 3:10) from where the English word architect is derived.[4]  But the tekton was not a carpenter in the modern sense of the word, but one who built with wood, and at times, stone and even metal.[5] It was an occupation of high social importance and wisdom, even though it did not generate an above average income.

Rabbinic literature indicates that if there was a problem in the village and no rabbi was available to resolve the issue, the question was asked, “Where is there a carpenter or a son of a carpenter?”  This occupation was a highly respected trade and, therefore, associated with skilled ability to resolve issues of life. In fact, so highly respected were carpenters, that when a scholar or rabbi walked into a room, the carpenter at work did not have to stand to honor him, but everyone else had to stop whatever they were doing to stand and honor him.[6]

Since Joseph was given the prestigious compliment of being righteous, it should not be a surprise that he was employed in this occupation.  The two most prominent scholars of the day, Hillel and Shammai, were also master carpenters. In Nazareth, situated in the quiet mountains of Zebulon of the Galilee district, Jesus earned His living in the manual trade of His father, as would have been the custom for young men. Scholars believe construction in the nearby city of Sepphoris created employment opportunities for many men who had those trade skills.  It is highly possible that Joseph and his sons worked there.

The fact that Sepphoris is not mentioned in the gospels or elsewhere is a mystery.  The city had a large Jewish population in the early part of the first century as determined by the many mikvaoth, or ritual baths, found in residential ruins by archaeologists.  Therefore, considering its Jewishness and employment opportunities, it is difficult to imagine Jesus not being here in His younger years working for other Jews and those sympathetic to them.[7]

However, some scholars have questioned whether orthodox Jews, such as Joseph and Jesus, would have accepted employment in an overtly pagan city. Sepphoris was dedicated to the Greco-Roman god Dionysus and filled with debauchery of every kind – male and female prostitution, gluttony, materialism, alcoholism, etc.  How could an orthodox Jewish man work there and not become defiled?  That was an issue the rabbis also pondered. Their answer is found in a set of guidelines they crafted to determine the types of Gentile construction projects Jewish craftsmen were permitted to work on. The Mishnah records the following,

None may help them build a basilica, scaffold, stadium, or judge’s tribunal; but one may help them to build public baths or bath houses; yet when they have reached the vaulting where they set up the idol it is forbidden (to help them) to build.

Mishnah, Zarah 1.7

While there were restrictions, Jewish men were permitted to find employment or have shops in Gentile cities. Sepphoris is only an hour’s walk from Nazareth and had a Cardo Maximums (Main Street) with shops on either side.  Craftsmen, farmers, and merchants would sell their goods to “city folk” and travelers.[8] Scholars believe, with a high degree of certainty, that it was somewhere along this “Cardo” where Joseph and Mary met, since tradition says she was born in Sepphoris.[9]

Experiences in the secular employment of Jesus eventually found its way into His teaching. Illustrations of this are the parable of the house builders (Mt. 7:24-27); the parable of the man who tore down his barn to build a bigger one (Lk. 12:16-21); the man who began building a tower without enough funds to complete it (Lk. 14:28 ff.); His interest in the foundations and structure of the temple (Mk. 13:1 ff.); and the parable about employing laborers (Mt. 20:1-16).

04.07.01a (2)

04.07.01.A. A NATURAL FOREST TYPICAL OF FIRST CENTURY WOODLANDS

04.07.01.A. A NATURAL FOREST TYPICAL OF FIRST CENTURY WOODLANDS.  A natural open-tree forest with meadows is located a short distance northwest of Nazareth.  While most of the trees in the land were destroyed during the Turkish Ottoman occupation (1517-1917) the trees of this small area of several hundred acres survived.  It can be seen today as Jesus saw it and it may have been from this forest where He obtained the wood for His craft.  Photograph by the author.

For thousands of years houses were built of stone in the mountain and desert regions, or with mud bricks along the coastal areas. Except for rafters and doors, there was very little wood in them. Many scholars believe the carpenter or tekton was a master stone mason and wood worker, the latter being a craftsman who made a wide variety of wooden household and agricultural utensils. Others argue that the tekton built the wooden supports for the construction of Roman arches rather than trim and shape stones.  A partial list of carpentry tools is found in Isaiah 44:13, such as the measuring line, marker, chisel, and compass which have been used throughout history in woodworking as well as masonry construction.[10]  The Greek poet Homer (c. 850 B.C.) said that the tekton constructed ships, houses, and temples.[11]  Clearly, he was a highly skilled craftsman among working men. His trade taught Him to transform dead and useless objects into living and useful things; that the meanest material fashioned and shaped can become precious, friendly and useful to men. Later He would teach the divine principles of the Kingdom of God so that dead and useless people could be become precious, friendly, and useful to God.

 04.07.01.B. A FIRST CENTURY “CARPENTER” AT WORK

04.07.01.B. A FIRST CENTURY “CARPENTER” AT WORK. This wood worker, in authentic costume, is employed at his woodcraft in a manner similar to the work of Joseph and Jesus.  Photograph taken at the reconstructed Nazareth Village by the author.  

 

04.07.01.C. TOOLS FOR WOOD AND STONE WORK OF A “CARPENTER.”

04.07.01.C. TOOLS FOR WOOD AND STONE WORK OF A “CARPENTER.” Typical tools such as hammers, chisels, and saws were used to make wooden implements such as plows and yokes for oxen.  Carpenters were also stone masons.  Photograph taken at the reconstructed Nazareth Village by the author.

04.07.01.D. A PLOW AND YOKE FOR TWO DONKEYS (2)

04.07.01.D. A PLOW AND YOKE FOR TWO DONKEYS. This plow and yoke, typical of biblical times, were acquired by the writer in Nazareth.  The natural formations of tree limbs were selected for the various parts of the implement. Photograph by the author.

04.07.01.E. TWO ARABS PLOWING IN THE 1920S AS IN BIBLICAL TIMES (2)

04.07.01.E. TWO ARABS PLOWING IN THE 1920S AS IN BIBLICAL TIMES. This plow design is known to be at least 4,000 years old as clay models of plows have been discovered in Egyptian tombs. Photograph by H. V. Horton.

04.07.01.F. TYPICAL WOODWORKING TOOLS

04.07.01.F. TYPICAL WOODWORKING TOOLS.  Typical tools of a first century carpentry shop that Joseph, Jesus, and His brothers might have used. Homes and workshops reflect more about a society and how people lived than monumental structures like palaces and temples. Photographed at the reconstructed Nazareth Village by the author.

04.07.01.G. RE-CREATED FIRST CENTURY STONE MASONS (“CARPENTERS”)

04.07.01.G. RE-CREATED FIRST CENTURY STONE MASONS (“CARPENTERS”). Builders, dressed in authentic attire, work on a building at the reconstructed Nazareth Village as Jesus may have done centuries ago.  Photograph taken at the Nazareth Village by the author.

04.07.01.H. THE CARDO MAXIMUS IN SEPPHORIS

04.07.01.H. THE CARDO MAXIMUS IN SEPPHORIS. Only a single column stands on the once proud street that was lined with columns and many shops along either side. The Latin name cardo maximus was the main street of any Roman city, and Sepphoris was the capital city of Galilee.  It was here where people came to shop and trade. Photograph by the author.

As previously stated, Nazareth was a village where peasants lived in stone houses that were cold and damp in the winter.  For this reason, whenever possible, a home was incorporated with a cave that offered stable temperate conditions: warm and dry in the rainy winter months, cool and pleasant in the hot dry summer. Houses had stone walls coated with a clay and straw mixture, with an occasional mud-lime plaster coating.  Windows were square or rectangular openings in the walls with a skin or wooden closure.  Floors were of packed dirt or flat stones, and roofs were made with dirt or stone and coated with a mud-lime plaster to create some degree of water-tightness.  Rainwater from the roof was channeled into a cistern for summer use. The stove was a small clay dome in which a fire was built.  Bread dough in the form of a modern pizza was laid upon the hard hot clay stove surface to bake.  Life in such primitive homes was so crude that it is almost impossible today to comprehend what the daily activities were like at that time.[12]

04.07.01.I. THE KITCHEN OF A RABBI’S HOUSE

04.07.01.I. THE KITCHEN OF A RABBI’S HOUSE.  The author stands in a reconstructed kitchen of a rabbi’s home in Katzrim, a fourth century (A.D.) Jewish village. The hanging shelf kept food safe from pesty animals.  In small villages, the rabbi generally generally had the nicest home. Photograph by Paivi Heinrich.

The homes of Jewish peasants generally had only two rooms, a family bedroom and another “family room,” which included the cooking area. It was the only room where guests could visit unless there was an attached courtyard.[13] The home in which Jesus lived may also have been a shelter for some valuable domestic animals.  These were kept indoors at night as not to be threatened by thieves or wild animals.  An example is found in 1 Samuel 28 where King Saul went to see the witch (medium) of Endor.  She took a calf from “within her house” (v. 24), killed it, prepared it, and served the king and his servants. Jesus said in Matthew 5:14-15 that a lamp that has been lit will give light to the whole house.  That was because houses were of simple design and consisted of a large room and a smaller sleeping room.  The wall separating the two rooms often had square openings called “windows” through which fresh air flowed and allowed some light to shine in.[14]

Most people in today’s Western culture would not have a great affection for first century country dining. Small bowls served as drinking cups and soup bowls. The first century diet was essentially a cereal diet, supplemented with seasonal fruits and vegetables.[15] The meat would have been fish that was grilled or dried and salted.  Any other meat was for rare special occasions.  During the cold rainy winter months, everyone would have eaten inside a crowded room, whereas in the warmer months family time was in the courtyard adjacent to the house.

04.07.01.J. THE INTERIOR OF A TYPICAL JEWISH HOME

04.07.01.J. THE INTERIOR OF A TYPICAL JEWISH HOME. The interior of this reconstructed 4th century house at the Katzrim (Qatzrim) Archaeological Park (Museum) is probably nearly identical to Jesus’ home.  The walls were constructed of large stones, with the ceiling/roof being either of stone or tree limbs with branches covered with plastered mud. The wall on the right side is an interior wall with a series of ventilation holes known as “windows.” This type of home is cold and damp during the winter rainy season and deadly, if occupied, during an earthquake.  Photograph by the author.

The gap between the wealthy and the common peasants was tremendous.  The houses of the common people, or am-ha-arets, were small and modest.  The ground floor tended to have a low ceiling with dark soot covering the walls.  Generally, cooking was done outside, except in the cold and wet winter months.  The first floor had between two and four rooms. Slightly wealthier homes had a few high openings that served as windows, and a courtyard shared by neighbors. Often the oldest son lived in an added room on the side of his parents’ house when he married.  If the house was on the side of a hill, at times a cave was part of the dwelling area for either human or animal occupancy.  The second floor had more window openings and a higher ceiling.  The flat roofs served as drying areas for food, water collectors, and places for family meetings or times of prayer (Acts 10:9).[16]

04.07.01.K. THE ANCIENT NAZARETH TO CAPERNAUM ROAD

04.07.01.K. THE ANCIENT NAZARETH TO CAPERNAUM ROAD.   Jesus often walked between Nazareth and Capernaum, He went through these distant wheat fields and down through the Valley of the Doves, as seen from the top of Mount Hittim.  On the right side is Mount Arbel with countless caves in its massive cliff face, and beyond it is the Sea of Galilee.  Photograph by the author.

Jesus was an itinerant preaching rabbi who could easily be seen as a wandering Jew.  Even as a child He journeyed to Egypt.  From the Egyptian dusty sand dunes, His parents took Him to the fresh waters and green hills of Galilee.  From Nazareth He often went to Jerusalem to observe the Lord’s feasts (also called the Jewish feasts). He was called of God to meet John the Baptist a short distance north of the Dead Sea where He was baptized. He traveled most often in the Galilee areas, namely in Capernaum, Chorazin, and Bethsaida. He walked through Samaria and to Gentile cities such as Gadara, Caesarea Philippi, Sidon, Tyre, and Syria. Jesus did not stay long in any village or city.   He was a traveler on a focused mission; a wayfarer in voluntary exile in the land of His own creation; to a people He desired to call His own.

Jesus lived, spoke, and taught like a Jew.  An in-depth study of rabbinic writings reveals that many sayings of Jesus had previously been spoken by other righteous rabbis. The Jewish people, therefore, were already familiar with many of the foundational principles upon which He proclaimed His Kingdom of God/Heaven. His discussions with opponents revealed His divine wisdom, yet He was in every way an orthodox Jew on a divine mission to bring fulfillment to the Old Covenant and usher in the age of the New Covenant.  A major difficulty of modern Christians is that we think of Jesus as a Christian without a Jewish culture or religion. In fact, He was an orthodox Jew who lived in a religiously conservative Jewish community.[17]

04.07.01.Q1 Why do the Gospels not give details of the childhood or young adult years of Jesus?

The gospels do not give detailed information on the childhood of Jesus, or what He did during the eighteen years between His visit to the temple at age 12 and the time He began His ministry between the ages of 31 and 33. The gospel writers clearly had their own purposes, as each one wrote for a specific reason to a specific audience. Each one desired to convey the message that Jesus lived, died, and arose from the grave for the salvation of mankind.  In other words, God stepped into human history to redeem mankind. That is the main point of every gospel![18] Other details were not considered important to any of the New Testament writers. All the teachings and miracles that are written in the four gospels point to the main point – that Jesus is the Messiah of fulfilled prophecies! If the gospels were historical treatises, detailed information on his childhood and pre-ministry years would be given.

It must be remembered that the writers were essentially oriental Jews – and ancient people of the orient thought differently than do modern Western people. Even European church leaders a few centuries after Christ reasoned and thought differently than did first century oriental Jews. Consequently, there are two negative reactions to the gospel narratives – one ancient and another modern.

  1. The absence of historical information on the early years of Jesus has given rise to numerous apocryphal myths, many of which were later immortalized by Italian artists during the Middle Ages. But the problem is that these so-called gospel writers lived centuries after Jesus and obviously did not know Him or His community personally, and at times, did not even reflect the Jewish culture. Often their “gospels” are little more than fanciful accounts or factious novels. Some include stories of dragons that bowed down to Him; of roses in Jericho that suddenly blossomed wherever Jesus walked by; how He formed a bird from clay and it came to life and flew away. Yet the creators of these legends failed to realize that any account that is not rooted in truth is an insult to His character and holiness. Jesus said that false teachers would come and satisfy itching ears. They may have meant to honor Him; but no fairy tale touted as truth can honor Jesus.[19]
  1. More recently, modern liberal scholarship says that the miracles are fictional events to build up the esteem of the Hero Jesus. Yet these opinions are without any ancient literary or archaeological foundation. The fact that most of the disciples and died horrible deaths says volumes about the truth they wrote and preached.[20] The opinions of liberal scholars are frequently found in the media around Christmas and Easter when many give serious thought to the biblical message.

Therefore, the reader must understand the gospels from the mindset of the original author and the message he conveyed to his audience. If God decided to place Jesus in the social framework of first century Judaism, then maybe believers of Jesus should learn something about first century Judaism and the social and political environment in which Jesus lived and ministered.

[1]. Barclay, “Luke.” 45.

[2]. Bookman, When God Wore Sandals. CD Trac 12;  Issler. “Exploring the Pervasive References to Work in Jesus’ Parables.” 327.

[3]. Batey, Jesus and the Forgotten City. 74; Packer, “Carpenter, Builder, Workman, Craftsman, Trade.” 1:279.

[4]. Vine, “Master Builder.” Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary. 2:396.

[5]. Campbell, “What was Jesus’ Occupation?” 512.

[6]. Babylonian Talmud, Kiddushin 29a and 33a; Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus, 3, 303-12.

[7]. Batey, Jesus and the Forgotten City, 72-75.

[8]. See a full-size artistic Cardo street scene at 16.01.07.A.

[9]. Chancery and Meyers. “How Jewish was Sepphoris in Jesus’ Time.” 20; See also “Guide to Sites.” By Biblical Archaeology Review. Staff. 60.

[10]. Visitors and students to Israel should visit reconstructed villages and witness first century life and the re-enactment of first century life with its crafts and trades.  Among the best as of this writing are the Biblical Garden at Yad Hashmonah, the Nazareth Village, the Katzrim (Qatzrim) Archaeological Park, and the Hasmonean Village northwest of Jerusalem along Route 443 near Modi’in.  A few miles further west along the same highway is the Neot Kedumim Park, a 625 acre biblical landscape reserve with reconstructed first temple period scenes.  Two other sites of interest is the Golan Heights Archaeological Museum north of the Sea of Galilee and the Philistine Museum in Ashdod.  A visit to one or more of these “living museums” will enhance one’s understanding of the cultural setting of the days of Jesus.

[11]. Barclay, “Mark.” 138.

[12]. Crossan and Reed, Excavating Jesus. 30-36.

[13]. Bailey, Jesus through Middle Eastern Eyes. 263.

[14].  Packer, Tenney, and White, eds. The Bible Almanac.  487-92.

[15]. Crossan and Reed, Excavating Jesus. 96.

[16]. Packer and Tenney, eds., Illustrated Manners and Customs. 489-90.

[17]. See 03.04.26; Meyers and Strange, Archaeology, the Rabbis and Early Christianity. 57.

[18]. Fischer, The Gospels in Their Jewish Context. (Lecture on CD/MP3). Week 1, Session 2.

[19]. Two examples are: 1) Ron Charles, who has gathered scores of fanciful legends and myths, mostly written between the sixth and sixteenth centuries, that pertain to the life of Christ in his book titled, The Search: A Historian’s Search for Historical Jesus. (Self-Published, 2007); and 2) Nicholas Notovich, whose book,  The Unknown Life of Jesus Christ. Trans. (Virchand R. Gandhi, Dover Pub.) is a so-called historical account of when Jesus went to Asia to study between the ages 13 and 29.

[20]. See Appendix 27: “The Faith Of The Disciples And Gospel Writers.”



  • Chapters